An interview with the killer.
Part 1
Q: Today, Western Europe has never been wealthier and an overwhelming
majority of Europeans live in prosperity with more freedoms than they have
ever had. Are you afraid that people in general will view you as the enemy, as a
threat to their prosperity and freedoms, as a threat to stability in Europe?
A: I can totally understand that most people will condemn people like us simply because
they do not ”yet” understand what is going on. And even if they do understand our
reasons they might disagree with our ”means”, thinking that democracy can solve this
problem as well just like democracy have solved many of the challenges we have faced in
the past. Europeans in general do not live in or close to Muslim ghettos or enclaves and
those that did have chosen to move far away. The problem is that many people live in
denial and are suffering from historical amnesia. They fail to identify or comprehend what
the Western European governments are doing to Europe. Those that do are hesitant to
resist through violent means.
While it is true that we currently enjoy wealth and many freedoms this will not be the
case in 50 or 100 years. The Muslims in many parts of Europe will make up the majority
within 2080. You must study the case of Lebanon and similar cases in order to
comprehend what is going on. Lebanon was a Christian territory once with 80%
Christians in 1911. Now, in today’s Lebanon, there are less than 25% Christians left. The
Muslims won the war and Europe just let it happen. The remaining Christians live under
harsh Dhimmitude and everyone in their right mind are attempting to flee the country. To
fully understand the situation I urge everyone to read ” Europe Burning”, book 2 of the
compendium: ”2083”. It is a complete overview of the current European situation and it
explains how we, the free people of Europe have lost any hope of reversing the current
development in Europe democratically. In other words, it explains why armed resistance
is the only option we have left to save Europe from the same fate as Lebanon.
The people of Western Europe have become slaves in their own countries, because they
have forgotten to pronounce the word ”no”.
It is quite common that large portions of the general population of any Western European
country (uncritical of their government’s indoctrination campaigns) strongly identify with
their monster polity, and take it personally when it's criticised or attacked. People in
general will oppose us as default because they do not know what we know; their
governments have made sure of that.
By marketing and distributing the compendium: 2083, and similar works, we hope to
create more awareness, create reference points and thus contribute to consolidate and
further our cause.
Most people will today openly condemn us as terrorists. However, a hundred years from
now we will be celebrated as pioneers, as heroes who gave their lives combating a tyrant
oppressor.
Q: Let’s say that the democratic struggle to save Europe from ”Islamisation/
Islamic demographic warfare” has been lost and that armed resistance against
the current establishment is the right way to go. How do you expect to seize
power from the current Western European cultural Marxist/multiculturalist
regimes knowing that there are only a handful of you who are willing to die for
the cause? Do you really expect to defeat all Western European governments
seeing that they control absolutely everything; the media, national police
forces, intelligence agencies, national militaries and have the full backing of
NATO?
A: A complete strategy is listed in the book “2083” but I can try to summarise it for you.
We see the struggle or the current Western European civil war if you will as a three stage
struggle.
- Phase 1, 2009-2030
- Phase 2, 2030-2070
- Phase 3, 2070-2083
Obviously, we are not able to execute any coup d’état or effectively incite to revolution at
this point (in phase 1). This was never the intention either.
Our only objective in this phase is to create awareness about the truth and contribute to
consolidation/recruitment. The establishment of military and political reference points
now will be of huge benefit especially further down the road.
The media have refused to forward our call the last decades. Instead they have
systematically ridiculed and silenced us, labelling us as intolerant and racist bigots.
Instead of respecting the will of the European people they have defiantly allowed even
more Muslims to enter and defended the current development. Now they are even
considering allowing Turkey into the EU. The only reason Turkey is not already in the EU
is because of the work of the non-military resistance movements of Europe. The EUSSR
elites may be evil but they are not stupid. They know that they will not get away with
including Turkey at this point because Europeans will simply not accept it. If they allowed
the Turkey to enter today and opened the borders to the Turkish Muslim hordes our
armed resistance groups would experience thousands of new recruits instantly, ready to
militarily secure our borders. The EUSSR elites know that, so they rely on a few more
decades of indoctrination before they will continue with the process.
By creating reference points with our operations we also force the media to acknowledge
our presence and agenda (which is a great defeat to the establishment in itself). Our
existence and actions are a living proof that they have made peaceful change impossible
and that they have therefore made violent resistance unavoidable. We are sending a
potent message to the European cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites; we are telling
them that we know what they have done and what they continue to do, we are watching
them and they will be punished for their crimes. We are coming for them. If not today
then tomorrow. cultural Marxists/multiculturalists in Oslo may be the target today, but
cultural Marxists in London, Paris, Berlin, Brussels, Milan or Madrid will be the target
tomorrow. This war has just begun and we have no intention of acting prematurely. We
know that time is on our side.
Unfortunately, spectacular operations like these are the only way to be heard. Everything
else we have tried has failed and yielded nothing. The Muslims showed us that deadly
shock attacks are the only tool we have at the moment which will guarantee that our
voice is heard. By forcing them to acknowledge our presence and explaining our agenda
to everyone we are making it very hard for the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist media
establishment to ignore the call of the free people of Europe. The message is simple: “WE
DO NOT WANT AND WILL NOT TOLERATE ISLAM IN EUROPE!” Any individual or
organisation that actively supports or are participating (directly or indirectly as silent
bystanders) in the Islamisation of Europe are flagged as valid targets, starting with the
MA 100 political parties and media organisations themselves.
We have tried protest through dialogue for 50 years now and that approach has been a
disaster for us. The phase of dialogue has now ended. The PCCTS is a part of that
manifestation. We will act as exemplary role models for our less organised brothers and
sisters across Europe in the decades to come.
The defeat of the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist network of Europe is closely linked with
the Islamisation of Europe.
It’s quite ironic that their downfall will be their own greed (the wish to import more and
more Muslim voters). Eventually, the political support for the EU’s Eurabia
project/European multiculturalism/Islamisation will erode but not before it’s too late. Our
phase 1 strategy is a simple strategy of repeated pin-pricks and bleedings that, though
small in proportion to the total force strength, sap the will of the current EU regimes to
continue the fight or at least will force them to open their eyes to reality earlier (and
identify the Islamisation of Europe as a threat to all Europeans).
There are no effective counter-measures against our phase 1 strategy. It is the most
efficient way of modern warfare. We are going to win this war eventually no matter how
they chose to act. If they comply with all our demands (and deport all Muslims from
Europe) we will win. If they don’t, then Islam will bring us to power in phase 3 (2070-
2083) when the Muslims reach 50%. At this point, the peoples of Europe will scream for
any group or individual who can come and solve their problems…
As long as the threat of Islam increases annually in Europe with Muslim populations
increasing with more than 1 million per year, increased ghettofication in combination with
Muslim atrocities against Europeans – harassment, robberies, rapes and murders), there
will be an increasing amount of willing recruits for conservative and/or for the European
anti-Jihad movements and even die-hard organisations like the Knights Templar.
As long as the threat of Islam and dhimmitude increases in Europe we will see more and
more indigenous liberation organisations like the Knights Templar. Even if we use brutal
methods we will continue to retain all of our strategic advantages of mobility, invisibility,
and legitimacy, in our own eyes and in the eyes of a good portion of the people.
Q: Some will claim that you are Christian fanatics, just as hateful and intolerant
as Al Qaeda. How would you react to accusations like that?
A: The PCCTS, Knights Templar is a European indigenous rights movement and a
Crusader movement (anti-Jihad movement), a part of the pan-European and national
resistance movement. In a way it is a conservative revolutionary movement.
By propagating and defending Christendom we simply mean that we want to halt the
cultural Marxist/multiculturalist attacks and systematic deconstruction on our Christian
cultures and the Church itself and to reverse the de-Christianisation of Europe. The
biggest threat to Europe is the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist political doctrine of
”extreme egalitarian emotionalism”. This type of political stance involves destroying
Christendom, the Church, our European cultures and identities and opening up our
borders to Islamic colonisation. The Islamisation of Europe is merely a ”secondary
infection”. Western Europe has grown weak and decadent and will be completely
annihilated culturally unless we succeed to implement a second European renaissance
and reverse the damage done.
History has shown again and again that you cannot co-exist peacefully with Islam. The
only thing you can do is to isolate it as our forefathers have done for the last 1400 years.
Jihadi Islamists are imperialistic aggressors who believe in armed global Jihad with the
purpose of aggressively (or through Dawah) conquer the world and will not give up until
all individuals have embraced Islam. We share none of these goals.
We on the other hand are a defensive military organisation who only seek to protect the
peoples of Europe and our cultures from genocide. In order for us to effectively protect
ourselves from Islam and Islamisation we must first defeat the Western European
multiculturalist regimes who are facilitating the ongoing colonisation.
Q: If you were to coin a word for the ideology or movement you represent, what
would it be?
A: Cultural conservatism or a nationalist/conservative direction known as the Vienna
school of thought. As for the political movement; I would describe it as a National
Resistance Movement, an Indigenous Rights Movement or perhaps a Conservative
Revolutionary Movement.
Justiciar Knights are not an ideologically homogenous group. Many Justiciar Knight
Commanders would probably reject some of my personal views as I would with theirs.
Some are deeply Christian while some are Christian agnostics or even atheists. Some are
individualists while others not so much so, some puritans. The primary factors that unites
us is that we are all nationalists, anti-Marxist, anti-Islam(isation), we support indigenous
rights and we are revolutionary, willing to martyr ourselves.
Q: Why aren’t you for freedom of religion where all religions are allowed to practice
equally without hindering one another?
A: I think most people are. The trouble is, of course, that Islam by its very definition falls
outside this category since it's a supremacist political ideology FIRST which SECONDLY
has certain religious components.
Q: Why do you say you’re not fascists when you support the suspension of the
constitution during a coup?
A: That’s a good question. First of all, the current multiculturalist regimes of Western
Europe are not at all democratic, They haven’t been democratic since the 1950s. There is
no basis for democracy when all state institutions including schools, universities
deliberately use advanced brainwashing techniques (as described earlier) to condition the
people from resisting their own annihilation through the implementation of cultural
Marxism/multiculturalist doctrines. Furthermore, there is no basis for democracy when
99% of all journalists support and propagate multiculturalism. There is no basis for
democracy when all patriots and nationalists are ignored, ridiculed or persecuted. Factors
such as these and many more have resulted in the Marxist tyranny we live under today.
The political and cultural elites are deliberately selling their own people into Islamic
slavery by allowing demographical warfare.
As Thomas Jefferson once stated;
“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and
tyrants.”
He also wrote:
"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right
of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its
foundation on such principles and organising its powers in such form, as to them shall seem
most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. [...] It is their right, it is their duty, to
throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
Refreshing the tree is now long overdue as our countries are in a rapid state of
disintegration. Our intention is to refresh the tree of liberty, and obviously not to cut it
down. Refreshing the tree of liberty involves a coup supported by a significant portion of
European patriots. Many of us will have to sacrifice our life for the cause in order to
destroy the tyrants of our time. It is impossible to guarantee a democratically sanctioned
coup as we have to keep in mind that Europeans have been brainwashed now for two
generations. Many will oppose us for our stance and call us fascist. Nevertheless, it is
essential to acknowledge and understand that we are not.
All coups involve the temporary suspension of the constitution. Thomas Jefferson himself
knew that. However, the goal of the coup is as I said not to chop down the tree of liberty
but to refresh it.
A fascist opposes the democratical concept altogether and wants a permanent one party
state, while we do NOT want this. In order to secure democracy we are forced to imbue
and strengthen it from its current downward spiral towards the abyss. This can only be
achieved through a temporary suspension of the constitution.
The constitution will only be suspended for a limited time, until we have had the
opportunity to implement at least some of our principles. These principles can’t even be
openly discussed at this point in time due to the paralyzing effects of political
correctness.
After a certain period, the constitution and the rule of democracy will again become the
primary standard. However, the dysfunctional mass-democracy will be replaced by an
administered form of democracy similar to that of Russia. This is obviously to ensure that
Marxists will never again get the chance to infiltrate state or media bodies. You can read
more about our solutions in another chapter of this compendium.
In any case, we oppose all ideological principles that propagate or suggest a one party
ruling form. And as such, we are anti-fascists by definition unlike the current
multiculturalist regimes.
Q: Some people will claim that you are just another Nazi fascist disguised with
anti-Muslim rhetoric. Is that true?
A: That is ridiculous Marxist propaganda. If that was true, then why am I working on a
weekly basis with fellow Indian, Jewish, Chilean intellectuals to preserve true, long term
democracy, to ensure that the will of the people is respected? Why do we champion
Israel’s cause when no one else is? Why do we propagate a military campaign, a military
Crusade to assist our eastern Christians brothers – the Semitic Copts, Maronites,
Assyrians? Why would we do this when they are not even considered “white”?
The old definitions do not apply anymore. The current internationalist elites (cultural
Marxists, suicidal humanists, globalists) are the Nazis of our age and deliberately
collaborating with the Muslims. They are the Quislings who are trying to transfer political
powers from our sovereign nations to a foreign political entity – the EUSSR/UN. Their
intention is to deconstruct everything European so we will become neutralised minorities
in our own countries. They expect us to willingly become easily manipulated pawns in
their globalised Marxist/globalist utopia.
This is not even a struggle between capitalists and socialists, it is a cultural war between
nationalists and internationalists. I consider myself to be a supporter of the capitalistic
system, although not globalist capitalism (where international corporations dictate much
of the doctrines). A free market within our own economic block is essential but our own
survival is the most important thing. To my left you will find a socialist, to my right you
will find a social democrat. We are all willing to sacrifice our life for each other as
nationalists/cultural conservatives because we believe in our common cause. To secure
the survival of everything European by preventing the ongoing cultural and demographic
genocide.
Q: Considering the fact that you may be willing to fight alongside so called neo-
Nazis against cultural Marxists under extreme circumstances, doesn’t that make
you a neo-Nazi or a neo-Nazi sympathiser?
A: First of all, I don’t consider 70-80% of so called neo-Nazis to be actual Nazis, but
rather misguided individuals. I believe many of these youngsters have made an
unfortunate mistake by being drawn to the Nazi symbols due to lack of alternatives and
because it is the strongest and most well known anti-Marxist banner. But I don’t believe
the majority of so called neo-Nazis really support the slaughtering and genocide of all
Jews, a one party state and an imperialistic policy of conquest. I believe they are just
bewildered nationalists in search for uniting factors. In their frustration they have chosen
the most despicable banner available as a way of saying a big “*** you” to the current
establishment. But I am well aware that 20-30% of them really hates Jews and support
most aspects of national-socialism. This shouldn’t be tolerated and we shouldn’t
sympathise with them whatsoever. Driven by their Jew hate, these Nazis are willing to
take side with Muslims in order to accomplish their goals. They are absolutely blinded by
this hate.
As for your question;
During WW2, the allied powers (Western Europe and the US) fought together with the
Soviets to defeat Nazi Germany. Did that make the allied powers communists or
communist sympathisers? And during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, the
Americans cooperated with Muslim fundamentalists. Did that make the Americans
Jihadists or Jihadi sympathisers? The Chinese nationalists and communists cooperated
against the Japanese occupational power during WW2. Did that make the nationalists –
communist sympathizers?
In war, you will see many alliances between ideologically opposing factions. You will
rarely win a war without seeking a broad alliance. When your peoples are facing cultural
and demographical genocide you are prepared to stretch far in order to prevent this from
happening. This is the fundamental logic of war.
Also, we haven’t forgotten what the Nazis did to the non-NS conservatives in the
“Conservative Revolutionary Movement”[1]. They executed many of them. We will not
make that mistake again. This is one other reason why non-NS conservatives will never
trust National Socialists. We know that they will try to wipe us out as soon as the cultural
Marxists, the suicidal humanists and the capitalist globalists have been defeated and
after the Muslims have been deported from Europe.
Let it be perfectly clear. The PCCTS, Knights Templar oppose National Socialism and we
do not seek cooperation with them. We see National Socialism as a hate-ideology as it is
genocidal and imperialistic in nature. However, we don’t have many potential allies.
As rational creatures we will go to great lengths to prevent our own demise and secure our
success.
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conserv...onary_movement
Q: What political denominations/groups will eventually flag support for the
European nationalist/cultural conservative groups?
A: Nationalists or anti-internationalists adhere to many ideological denominations. In
essence, all patriots (by the true definition if its meaning) are nationalists but not all
traditionalists are necessarily nationalistic (f example some Christian fundamentalists and
ethnocentric groups). The word “nationalist” has been tainted by history so I prefer the
word “cultural conservative”. Cultural conservatism has obviously nothing to do with
Toryism (traditional conservatism) but rather from the words true meaning: to conserve.
A majority of Tories and Republicans are no longer “conservatives” as they support
multiculturalism.
You will find most political denominations on our side varying from the apolitical
moderate patriotic and freedom loving European to more extreme factions:
Patriotic liberalists-libertarians-capitalists-socialists-social democrats, Christian agnostics-
atheists-fundamentalists, any anti-internationalist conservative, liberal/progressive,
conservative Hindus-Jews-Buddhists, anti-authoritarians, anti-racists, racists, anti-
fascists/fascists, traditionalists and even some national socialists and nationalist
Bolsheviks. I find it quite ironic that an increasing number of anti-internationalist Marxists
join our side. We also see some Muslims convert to Christianity and begin to support our
cause.
The ongoing cultural war will polarise societies and countries further and there will be two
main factions. The nationalists/conservatives (cultural conservatives) vs. the
internationalists (Marxist internationalists, suicidal humanists and capitalist globalists).
The apolitical career cynisists will follow anyone in charge. Our biggest strength (despite
of seemingly overwhelming odds at the moment) is that we have approximately 13
million nationalists spread across Europe willing to die for the cause while only a fraction
is willing to die for “internationalism”. Of course, the internationalists may eventually
attempt to arm the Muslims in Western Europe but if it comes to that they have already
lost. They will lose the support of all remaining non-Muslims and will be left with only a
hardcore Marxist elite with a significantly reduces loyalist/Muslim police/military force. At
this point in time, a majority of the former police force/military will fight by our side.
At the moment, approximately 60% of Europeans (excluding Muslims) support our
fundamental political doctrines but obviously not necessarily the means. However, the
most important distinction here is the male/female ratio of our sympathisers.
Approximately 70% of European males support our cause while only 30% of European
women. As a consequence, when this is all over we must significantly reduce these
women’s influence on political issues relating to national security, social structures, penal
policies, border control, immigration, assimilation, certain cultural issues – national
cohesion and procreation (birth) policies. This is perhaps the most important lesson we
must learn, the betrayal by so many of our own women. It is not really a betrayal as a
majority of our women only thinks and acts in accordance with how nature created them
– in a suicidal compassionate manner. But it is essential that we prevent our women from
propagating their suicidal compassion in “safe and more controlled environments” in the
future. Sure, this is sexist policies but nature itself is sexist and you cannot defy primary
natural laws. This rule will not be without exceptions though and we should keep in mind
that 30% of European women do support us.
Q: If your National government had been very restrictive in regards to
conserving identity, culture and halted Islamic immigration completely would
you still have engaged in operations against them?
A: If my country was on the forefront for ”delaying” Islamisation it would obviously be
counter-productive to launch attacks against that particular regime first. Norway is
perhaps the most suicidal of all Western European countries today. We are on the
forefront in the propagation of ”self-annihilation” policies such as dialogue and
appeasement toward Islam. The country has also created a tradition to use the Nobel
Peace Prize as a tool for Islamic appeasement efforts. I have no moral reservations
whatsoever against participating or leading military operations against Norwegian
Category A and B traitors as it is the most basic of human rights to defend your people
against genocide.
Denmark, being stricter than many countries, will still be unable to prevent the Islamic
demographic warfare through democratic means but at least they are buying some extra
time by implementing relatively strict rules.
Q: “Racist, Nazi, Fascist, Homophobe, Islamophobe” How do you react to the
“cultural Marxist/multiculturalist” labelling techniques, or psychological
warfare if you will?
A: These are typical EUSSR cultural Marxist/multiculturalist labelling techniques.
According to them, anyone who attempts to criticise multiculturalism are racists,
intolerant bigots, angry, underprivileged males etc.
The thinking seems to be that there are only two versions of Europeans. If you do not
support multiculturalism 100% you are a Nazi. You’re also a fascist pig, a racist, a
homophobe – in other words a sub-human. This attitude betrays an all-pervasive hatred
that demonises absolutely anything Europeans do to protect their dignity, culture and
heritage. Multiculturalism is an anti-European hate ideology. As such, they are the Nazis
of our time, not us.
I consider myself to be an anti-racist, anti-fascist and anti-Nazi. That’s the main reason
why I oppose Cultural Communism/European multiculturalism. THEY are the Nazis, they
are the fascists and they are the racists! I have witnessed much racism in my time but
90% of it has been against Europeans. I have actually never been called a racist, fascist
or Nazi before personally but I know it is the preferable tactic of the cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist establishment to silence the masses.
We are not National Socialists, in fact, we oppose National Socialists.
I personally do object to the “gay media hysteria” which has been going on in
Western Europe the last two decades. In many cases “alleged victim groups” are
subjected to positive discrimination within politics, media and certain sectors. In those
specific contexts it has become standard policy to discriminate so called “heterosexual
men”. Western European media, especially in the protestant countries are obsessed with
cheering the gay community and other minorities they see as “preferred groups” in their
so called “victim hierarchy”. The glorification of “preferred groups” in the EUSSR “victim
hierarchy” have gone too far. It’s racist and fascist.
Q: Why do you think it has come to this?
A: Multiculturalists in Western Europe has gradually become fanatical egalitarian, the fight
against “discrimination” of any kind, the idea that all groups of people should have an equal
share of everything and that it is the state’s responsibility to ensure that this takes place.
Multiculturalists have cultivated a culture of victimhood in the West, where you gain
political power and media attention through your status in the victim hierarchy. In many
ways, this is what Political Correctness is all about.
The extreme egalitarianism you see in NW Europe
today has developed into a crusade against everything and everyone who does not
conform to the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist world view. According to the Nazis of our
time; the multiculturalists: if you do not support multiculturalism you are considered
human garbage and the persecution of human garbage is allowed and even encouraged.
Q: Why sacrifice your own life for something that might not end up as you
project? And why would you be willing to sacrifice your life for others? Why
don’t you just chose the easy way, live the easy life, conform and enjoy all
benefits of modern society offered under the current regimes?
A: This is exactly what my family and friends have implored me to do for years now.
They have pressured me and I must admit I have been somewhat ridden by guilt in this
regard. At the same time I know what has to be done. I could never ignore the current
situation without doing anything. In this regard I felt I had two choices. Create a large
family (3-5 children) or completely focus on my tasks as a part of the European
resistance movement. I don’t understand why so many people can simply ignore the
current situation without doing anything. How can they look their kids in the eyes in the
future knowing that they have done nothing? How can they even act so suicidal and
continue to vote for political parties who support multiculturalism? Their children are the
ones who will have to fight in the coming civil war against the Islamist/cultural Marxist
alliance. They will ask their parents; “why didn’t you do anything, how could you allow
this to happen?” They are the ones who have to fight and perhaps die in Phase 3 because
my generation (and my parents generation) didn’t have the guts to stop the current
development. It’s not right. I feel a strong obligation to contribute in Phase 1 even if I
succumb in the process. It is essential that as many individuals as possible contribute
even if it just results in creating a small crack in the discriminating and genocidal
multiculturalist system. Every effort counts, even the smallest contribution!
“It is better to live one day as a lion, then one hundred years as a sheep.”
Most of the people I know are either cowards or apathetic hypocrites. They know exactly
what is going on but many of them don’t care at all, because they know that they will be
dead before phase 3. I don’t want to judge them too harshly considering the fact that I
used to be an apathetic hypocrite myself. After all, we are all victims in a way as we have
been indoctrinated for decades by the multiculturalist system. However, everyone living
near a capital or a major European city is witnessing the current developments. They
don’t care because it doesn’t concern them yet. Standing up for their beliefs will involve
suffering. They are deliberately avoiding that for as long as possible.
It has always been very tempting to just go with the flow, sticking your head in the sand
and deal with problems as they arise. Having passed the age of 30, I’m now in a situation
where I have to decide whether I want to get married and start a family. I can choose to
live a normal life if I want to, just like my friends are doing. Get a cute girlfriend, get
married, have kids, continue my career and earn 50 000-60 000+ Euro per year. The
problem as I see it is that I truly fear for the future of Europe. How can I procreate
knowing that we are heading for cultural suicide? By being a silent bystander to this I will
be as guilty as our corrupt elites. How could I silently watch while Islamic demographic
warfare is being waged against our societies, diminishing our numbers and the influence
over our very own lives? I feel compelled to act, even though I know that very few will
dare to become one of the pioneers, one of the first martyrs in Phase 1. There are only
two logical steps for people my age; have as many children as possible and prepare for
Phase 2 or 3 or fight now in Phase 1. I chose the latter.
As for the general public; people don’t care as long as their loved ones are safe. They
have careers with solid salaries; they enjoy all the current freedoms. Why on earth would
they give up on all that and join a resistance movement? Joining an anti-Jihad movement
means becoming a political dissident. The government and media will attempt to label
you as a racist or an intolerant bigot and use any means necessary to undermine your
efforts, you risk losing your job, you risk losing everything. The core question is, why
chose the hard way, when you have the option of choosing the easy way? Why chose to
suffer when you do not have to?
There are good men and there are individuals who don’t care at all. The person who has
nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own
personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and
kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.
I chose selflessness, to resist a tyrant oppressor by all means necessary. I couldn’t live
my life as a cowardly hypocrite, sticking my head in the sand.
Q: What’s your view on moderate anti-immigration parties?
A: Their motives are noble although counter-productive. Anti-immigration parties usually
start out as idealistic but end up as a diluted and corrupt verion of their former selves. It
would be better if they admitted the truth, that the democratic struggle to save Europe
has been lost and the only way to proceed is by resisting the establishment by other
means. In many ways, they are contributing to pacify the people by giving them false
hope.
Even if they are included as a partner in a future government their policies will end up
being too diluted to make any difference. You cannot become the government unless you
bow to the views of the ”Centre-Left” media elite, especially the broadcast media elite.
They will never get more than 35% of the votes in any election, even in phase 2. As
such, they may be able to delay a Muslim majority by a couple of decades with strict
integration and immigration policies but they will still be unable to prevent the eventual
confrontation.
Q: Can significant indirect damage against civilians be justified?
A: Yes and no. It can be justified in the sense that it is the only pragmatical way to move
forward. When someone blows up a government building it is obviously not with the
intention to kill the cleaning lady or the janitor. The target has been selected after careful
consideration because it will yield the wanted results.
There are extreme and moderate forces. We are all cultural conservatives even though
we use different means. We have taken it upon ourselves to use brute, cynical force so
other people don’t have to. The other political fronts should welcome it as a necessary
evil in order to rid ourselves of a much greater evil.
Innocent people will die, in the thousands. But it is still better than the alternative;
millions of dead Europeans, which is the worst case phase 3 scenario.
Q: What about atheists and Odinists, can they join the PCCTS, Knights Templar?
A: If you want to fight for the cross and die under the “cross of the martyrs” it’s required
that you are a practising Christian, a Christian agnostic or a Christian atheist (cultural
Christian). The cultural factors are more important than your personal relationship with
God, Jesus or the holy spirit. Even Odinists can fight with us or by our side as brothers in
this fight as long as they accept the founding principles of PCCTS, Knights Templar and
agree to fight under the cross of the martyrs. The essence of our struggle is to defeat the
cultural Marxist/multiculturalist regimes of Western Europe before the we are completely
demographically overwhelmed by Muslims.
I have studied Norse Mythology and have a lot of respect for the Odinist traditions. I
consider myself to be a Christian, but Odinism is still and will always be an important part
of my culture and identity.
Q: Is it likely that Odinists will support the cause of the PCCTS, Knights
Templar, considering the fact that many of them hate Christendom?
A: First of all, as a Norwegian, I am extremely proud of my Odinistic/Norse heritage as it
is an essential aspect of my culture and my identity. However, things aren’t black and
white. Supporting the Christian cultural heritage does not automatically mean you hate
Odinism or vice versa. There are pragmatical considerations Odinists have to evaluate as
well. Do they really believe the symbolism of Mjöllnir (Thors hammer) has the potential
to unite the Nordic peoples against the forces we are facing? Do they really believe
Odinistic symbolism would be more suitable compared to the uniting force of
Christendom’s symbolism and that of the cross? Anyone with half a brain will know that
only the symbolism of the cross (which is a part of all the Nordic flags btw with the
exception of Germany) has the potential to unite us for this cause. Choosing to fight
under the banner of the cross, does not constitute that you have to reject your Odinistic
heritage in any way or form. As for their claim that a Christian principle of suicidal
humanism is a part of the root of our current problems, I couldn’t agree more. However,
instead of abandoning Christendom altogether I know European Christendom can be
reformed. The Church wasn’t always as weak and suicidal as it is today. The Odinists
needs to understand that the Church they hate is the cultural Marxist Church and not the
real Church. The Church I love doesn’t exist anymore because it has been deconstructed.
However, I know that it can be reformed and that it again will embrace and propagate
principles of strength, honour and self defense. Instead of abandoning the Church we will
save it and re-create it as a nationalistic Church which will tolerate and allow (to a very
large degree) native cultures/heritage/thought systems such as Odinism.
As a cultural Christian, I believe Christendom is essential for cultural reasons. After all,
Christianity is the ONLY cultural platform that can unite all Europeans, which will be
needed in the coming period during the third expulsion of the Muslims.
Odinism is significant for the Nordic countries but it does not have the potency to unite
us against such a devastating force as Islam, cultural Marxism/multiculturalism and
capitalist globalism. Only Europeans, in solidarity with each other, can solve our current
problems. As for secularism, are there any strong uniting symbols at all? I think not. In
order to protect your culture you need, at the very minimum, strong, uniting symbols
representing your culture. In this context, the cross is the unrivalled as it is the most
potent European symbol. I have had this discussion with many Odinists, and even they
understand this.
Odinists need not fear us as they should consider us brothers in our common fight. I
strongly encourage them to support us. Because we might not succeed in our struggle to
defeat the EUSSR cultural Marxist/multiculturalist hegemony without their support.
Q: Do I have to believe in God or Jesus in order to become a Justiciar Knight?
A: As this is a cultural war, our definition of being a Christian does not necessarily
constitute that you are required to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus. Being
a Christian can mean many things;
- That you believe in and want to protect Europe’s Christian cultural heritage.
The European cultural heritage, our norms (moral codes and social structures included),
our traditions and our modern political systems are based on Christianity - Protestantism,
Catholicism, Orthodox Christianity and the legacy of the European enlightenment (reason
is the primary source and legitimacy for authority).
It is not required that you have a personal relationship with God or Jesus in order to fight
for our Christian cultural heritage and the European way. In many ways, our modern
societies and European secularism is a result of European Christendom and the
enlightenment. It is therefore essential to understand the difference between a “Christian
fundamentalist theocracy” (everything we do not want) and a secular European society
based on our Christian cultural heritage (what we do want).
So no, you don’t need to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus to fight for our
Christian cultural heritage. It is enough that you are a Christian-agnostic or a
Christian-atheist (an atheist who wants to preserve at least the basics of the European Christian
cultural legacy (Christian holidays, Christmas and Easter)).
The PCCTS, Knights Templar is therefore not a religious organisation but rather a
Christian “culturalist” military order.
Q: Why haven’t we heard anything about PCCTS, Knights Templar before,
considering the fact that the organization was formed in 2002?
A: That’s a good question. I am surprised why EU countries haven’t labeled our
organization yet. Perhaps it is politically motivated psychological warfare, who knows?
First of all, I only met 4 out of the 9 original founding members due to security
precautions and I only know the identity of 5 of them (4 of them know my identity).
There might be tens, even hundreds of Justiciar Knights now spread all across Western
Europe as far as I know. I haven’t heard anything from the media about PCCTS, Knights
Templar operations before either which indicates the following; either some of the
original cells have not activated yet, which is not very likely considering the fact that the
military order was formed more than 8 years ago. Or a couple of the cells may have
perished or have been arrested in the planning phase before they even activated. Or
perhaps they did activate and went through with their operation but did not manage to
penetrate media censorship. A successful operation might have been labeled as an
“accident” or otherwise censored by the media/regime. Perhaps a couple of them simply
didn’t want to proceed alone or in a party with 1-2 other individuals but needed or
wanted the support from a larger traditional hierarchy and joined another organisation
instead. A few might have gotten cold feet and went about their usual business and
abandoned our struggle and campaign altogether. It is really hard to tell. I do know
however that there have been more than a hundred successful operations from armed
nationalist movements in Europe the last decade. But the main problem is that a great
majority of these operations are not “spectacular” enough to break media censorship.
There are too many threats made and not enough action to make a substantial difference
at this point. But the resistance movements in Europe are continuously growing and
evolving. It is understandable that many organisations will require more time in order to
reach a point where they are actually making an ideological difference. I feel it is the
responsibility of the PCCTS, Knights Templar to contribute to speed up this process by
acting as good role models for all European patriots. It is just a matter of time before one
cell succeeds with a spectacular operation. I estimate that there are thousands of cells
around Western Europe in the planning phase of an operation while we speak. I don’t
worry about it as it is still relatively early in phase 1 and we have up to 70 years to win
this war, before we are demographically overwhelmed and the systems collapse either
way. Another scenario might be that due to the nature of our extremely decentralised
platform, the original constitution of the concept might have (for a couple of the co-
founders) morphed into different manifestations/interpretations of resistance movements
with slightly different political manifests.
I wonder sometimes if one of the EDL founders was one of the co-founders of PCCTS, I
guess I’ll never know for sure. EDL is a non-violent protest organisation though but I
noticed they have copied a lot from the PCCTS. Then again, it is most likely just a
coincidence. I do think a lot about what happened to some of the co-founders. It’s
pointless to speculate I guess but I check the news regularly to see if anything has
slipped through the media blackout relating to actions launched by individual resistance
fighters or the European Resistance Organisations. I may or may not have had contact
with at least 2 of these co-founders since the founding. Obviously, I can’t reveal any
sensitive information so the above characteristic might be what I want you to believe and
not the actual truth .
Q: How would you argue against criticism from other so called European
chivalric organisations like the Freemasons, the OSMTH and similar?
A: They claim to be Knights of Christ yet they are not willing to sacrifice their life for the
preservation of European Christendom. They do not even acknowledge that European
Christendom is in the process of being deconstructed. They claim to be Knights but they
are not even warriors. How can they claim to be today’s manifestation of a pious chivalric
order when the core doctrine of the Knights Templar was to submit to voluntary poverty?
All I see is a group of decadent individuals who are not willing to make any substantial
sacrifices for anyone or anything. Furthermore, Knighthood is directly linked to
martyrdom. Taking martyrdom out of knighthood would be like taking elections out of a
democracy. A person unwilling to martyr himself for a greater cause can never call
himself a Knight and a Christian individual unwilling to martyr himself for the
preservation of European Christendom can never call himself a Knight of Christ. We, the
PCCTS, Knights Templar, can, and we are currently the most genuine successors to their
legacy. It is, however, not our goal to completely mimic the order. Demanding that our
members undergo a theological education would be pointless as today’s curriculum has
been corrupted by Christian pacifists and suicidal humanists. Furthermore, creating a
religious order would be counter-productive as a majority of Europe’s armed resistance
fighters are agnostics, atheists or relatively secular Christians. The organisation is
therefore considered a moderate Christian identity organisation and not a religious order.
Anyway, the Freemasons or the OSMTH cannot be compared to the PCCTS, Knights
Templar. Yet, I do respect their role in society. They are fine representatives and curators
(keepers of cultural heritage) and therefore fulfil an essential role. In fact, we have much
to learn from them and are likely to go to them (their libraries) for research purposes.
We salute them for their everyday efforts but will not accept any criticism from them or
similar “so called” chivalric organisations.
Q: What do you expect the future Cultural Conservatives intend to do with the
”cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites” if they manage to seize power?
A: This really depends on the circumstances, how far it will go before the sitting regime
rejects multiculturalism and real changes are made, or how many native Europeans will
be killed in the process. They have until 2020 to capitulate to cultural conservative
forces. However, I am not naive enough to expect a surrender. It is a formality in our 100
year struggle. If the expected scenario transpires (they refuse to surrender and reject all
our demands) I would assume that all category A and B traitors will be executed and
their property expropriated. Category C traitors (up to 10 000 per million) will receive a
fitting punishment depending on their crime. It may vary from imprisonment to
expropriation of property or losing the right to work in certain positions or professions.
Obviously, many of us reading this will not be alive in phase 3 (2070-2090). Many
unforeseeable factors might occur which is impossible to predict so our guidelines are
exactly that, guidelines.
Q: Why do we lack credible unbiased analysis of the current right wing?
A: First of all, it is not possible to discuss the ”far right wing” objectively if you chose to
follow modern politically correct narratives. This is the main reason why there aren’t any
meaningful debates about this important topic. The only ”politically correct” approach to
current far right wing movements is to label them all as ”evil fascists, racists, Nazis,
bigots” and move on. Anyone who tries to scratch the surface and analyse these
ideologies further become suspects themselves and might even be labelled as bigots.
Racism is considered the ”arch sin” in our societies so everyone avoids any analysis
around this topic due to the fear that stigma is attached. As we all know; if you are
labelled as a racist even once you are as good as dead, from a political viewpoint at least.
This is unfortunately the reason why there are no constructive debates on this important
topic. In order to fully analyse the right wing you need to completely detach yourself
from the politically correct narrative and approach the topic objectively and
pragmatically.
I hesitated to include this analysis, mainly because I instinctively dislike writing about
anything related to race, ethnicity and Jew hate. I was brought up that way and I still
suffer many effects of two decades of multiculturalist indoctrination. Also, I am against
the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist alliance and an Islamic presence in Europe, so writing
about skin colour would only be counter-productive. However, we can’t really ignore NS if
we are to make a completely honest evaluation. Western nations can never mount a
defence against the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist alliance and Islamic demographic
warfare unless we manage to convert the NS over to a more sensible and appealing
ideology. The objective is that all their supporters join our cause. This is why it’s
important to argue against the NS ideology instead of ignoring them.
Q: What do you consider the primary obstacle to Western European right wing
consolidation?
A: In order to answer that fully you first have to define right wing. What is right wing?
Nationalism, capitalism, individualism, Christian Puritanism, Christendom, cultural
conservatism, racial conservatism or perhaps traditionalism? Some terms will always be
over-lapping. It’s important to understand that the definition of right wing is constantly
changing based on perceived ”threats”. These changes varies greatly though and does
not really apply for more ”constant” beliefs such as Christian Puritanism, and National
Socialism. Personally, I don’t fully consider NS as a right wing alternative due to its
socialist nature. Nevertheless, let’s review different ”perceived” far right wing directions
and their major traits:
1. Christian far right wing: anti abortion etc (strict puritan beliefs).
2. New right: pro-free-market within a greater European block at least, pro Jewish, anti-
Islamisation, anti-multiculturalist, anti-racist.
3. NS right wing: anti-Jewish, anti-capitalistic, racial conservatives.
a. All Western governments are ZOG – Zionist Occupied Governments.
b. The Jews are the cause for the implementation of multiculturalism with all its modern
manifestations. Capitalism is a Jewish invention with the purpose of enslaving all non-
Jews.
c. The Jews wish to destroy the white race by flooding Europe and the US with “blacks
and Asians”. This has been done by creating and implementing “multiculturalism”.
4. Laissez-faire Capitalism is a globalist concept (no government intervention). Laissez-
faire is often used to refer to various economic philosophies and political philosophies
(liberalism) which seek to minimise or eliminate government intervention in most or all
aspects of society.
5. Fascism – one party state, often cultural and racial conservatives. No common and
concise definition exists for fascism and historians and political scientists disagree on
what should be in any concise definition. The term fascist is used as a pejorative word, a
phrase that implies disapproval or contempt and is meant to be insulting.
Q: Are you a holocaust denier?
A: Assuming of course that you are referring to the Jewish holocaust under Nazi
Germany; no, I have reviewed the evidence, both the evidence presented by the Allied
powers and the anti-holocaust evidence presented by the Axis Powers and neo-Nazi
movements. I don’t find the anti-holocaust evidence credible so I don’t see a reason why
anyone should deny the Jewish holocaust. As far as I have understood; Nazi Germany
didn’t originally want to annihilate the Jews. They were considering deportation but they
didn’t really have any location to deport them to, and they weren’t offered any location
by the allied forces. They didn’t start massacring the Jews until after they realised that
they were losing the war and the window of opportunity was closing fast (after the failed
Russian invasion in1941). I guess, they used the following logic; they felt they had to cut
out what they viewed as a cancer before they lost the war somewhat like many Serbs did
during the Balkan war. They wanted to deport but as their adversaries made that
impossible they chose the only solution (according to their logic). No one should try to
justify genocide, it is a bad thing that cannot or should not be excused. There are always
other options.
My problem with holocaust denial however is the European cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist elite’s refusal to acknowledge the Christian, Hindu, Buddhist,
Zoroastrian genocides by the hand of the Islamic Ummah. Islam has systematically
slaughtered more than 300 million people since its creation and this trend is continuing
every year (see the continuation of the Assyrian, Coptic, Maronite, Hindu genocides in
the Middle East). The politically correct elites of the EUSSR/USASSR are the true
holocaust deniers as they refuse to acknowledge current and historical Islamic atrocities.
Furthermore, while I oppose deniers of the Jewish holocaust I realise that the “holocaust
religion” is an extremely destructive force in Europe. Today, European youths are
systematically brainwashed and made into pacifist eunuchs (school classes being bussed
to former concentration camps and taught to reject their culture, pride etc.). Our elites,
backed by the EUSSR/USASSR cultural hegemony, are stripping away any sense of pride
and honor from European youths in a deliberate scheme to feminise/pacify them in order
to prevent future Nazi movements from emerging. The problem here is that we are left
with little to none cultural defenses against any force which would want to conquer us.
This is why the Islamic Ummah have been taken advantage of our lack of cultural
defenses and are currently colonising us, facilitated by our traitorous cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist elites.
The “holocaust religion” has grown into a destructive anti-European monster, which
prevents nationalistic doctrines from emerging. And without nationalistic doctrines,
Europe will wither and die, which we are seeing today. It’s quite ironic that Even Israel
would appear to have become a victim of it. Needless to say, while I am a strong
supporter of Israel and of all patriotic Jews I acknowledge that the anti-European
holocaust religion must be deconstructed, and instead replaced with an anti-Islamic
version. After all we are talking about a disproportion of 6 million killed Jews vs. 300
million massacred Jews/Christians/Hindus/Buddhists/Zoroastrians/Animists.
As of now, the “holocaust religion” is one of the major factors that are making Europe
vulnerable and susceptible for Islamic conquest through demographical warfare.
European cultural conservatives are today faced with the similar scenario that our Serb
brothers were. Yes, we are going to deport every single Muslim from Europe, but we
must do everything in our power to avoid unnecessary bloodshed as it would hurt our
cause and serve as a catalyst to consolidate our adversaries and allow them to justify the
use of unrestricted military power against us. So what if our enemies bomb our roads,
rail ways and boats, making it impossible to deport? If we are prevented from deporting
we must focus on the real issues and not do anything short sighted. If we do not have a
military or political advantage we should focus on preserving and strengthening our
fragile regime instead of risking it all by acting prematurely. In that scenario, we should
wait a few years until more countries join our alliance until the day where we have the
required roads, trucks, railroads and boats (and a sufficient military force to protect
ourselves) in order to start deportations.
Q: Why do you consider National Socialism to be a “dead” ideology?
A: First of all, the reason I’ve made extensive research around the following fields is
because I think it’s time that all Western European NS’s realises the harm they are
causing in regards to right wing consolidation. National Socialism was designed for
Germany after WW1 and it addressed the concerns and needs of the time (according to
them). The ideology was defeated in WW2 but many right wing individuals still refuse to
let it go. By doing so they are effectively undermining CURRENT concerns and needs of
our time. There are currently so many defensive mechanisms in place in Western
European societies against National Socialism that any attempt to resurrect the ideology
will be counter-productive.
The relatively new Anti-Eurabian, Christian cultural conservative stance however is an
ideology specifically designed to resist these defensive mechanisms or “baits” if you will.
The goal of my argumentation is to contribute to remove the last doubts with the
remaining NS’s. Everyone who wants to contribute to save Europe from cultural genocide
should reject National Socialism and instead chose the Anti-Eurabian, Christian cultural
conservative stance. It is a hybrid of various right wing concepts which has the potential
to gain the support of aprox 35% of Europeans.
At the end of the day the goal is all that matters. If you are unable to conform and adapt
to current and modern concepts which has the potential to bring us to power you will
only undermine your own efforts.
It should be noted though that the majority of the individuals who are labelled as NS
today by the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist establishment are not at all NS and very
often opposed to any NS policies. There are, however, NS out there, some are
ideologically confident senior members and many young and “confused” so called neo-
Nazi’s who mimic the older generation NS. This is a huge challenge that must be
addressed.
"Deceitfulness is the most basic concept in warfare and in politics."
Muhammad himself made this statement more than 1000 years ago. Politics is war. If you
are unable to understand this concept then you have already lost. The Marxists, like the
Muslims, are masters of deception.
The Muslims understand this very well and have institutionalised deceit through the
concept of “al-Taqiyya”. The multiculturalists or cultural Marxists have institutionalised
deceit through advanced concepts. They want to destroy Western Civilisation and the
European identities.
Multiculturalism is an anti-Western hate ideology aimed at undermining the indigenous
peoples of Europe and destroying European civilisation and culture. However, they have
created an illusion that the ideology is all about tolerance. Multiculturalism has never
been about tolerance. It is an evil ideology bent on an entire culture's eradication.
We have to give both the Muslims and the cultural Marxists credit though. I respect their
ingenuity if anything.
They have systematically ideologically coerced/brainwashed two generations of
Europeans in the attempt to modify people’s social and political philosophy and instilling
certain attitudes or beliefs in a person. The aim has been to affect individual value
systems and subsequent thought-patterns and behaviours. And they have succeeded to a
large degree.
This has been done by the use of falsified or biased statistics, falsified or biased sources,
biased/unbalanced coverage, labelling opponents as bigots/racists/Nazis - using
propaganda, manipulation and other forms of trickery in order to lay the foundation for a
new society based on multiculturalism and emotionalism/extreme egalitarianism. They
have therefore managed to limit opposition/resistance towards themselves and towards
mass-Muslim immigration/Islamic demographic warfare.
As a result we are under the current Islamic invasion/colonisation. In 1955 there were
less than 50 000 Muslims in Western Europe. Today there are more than 25 million.
What have the NS movement achieved in this period?
Not as much as they could have, they have spent much of their time defending an
already “exposed” ideology that has no popular support whatsoever. An ideology which
started as a “deceitful” ideology but who has been completely exposed for what it is. The
most popular NS party has received a maximum of 5% support in any election the last 50
years. I can’t really find the words to describe how counter-productive the NS ideology is
in today’s society. It serves as the primary catalyst and reason why multiculturalism has
been so successful.
I’m going to try to cover many aspects of NS in order to describe why I think the current
NS’s should reject this ideology and support the new Western European right wing
movement (pro-Jewish, anti-Islamic stance).
Q: Is it possible that cultural conservatives and National Socialists will
cooperate in the future?
A: It will be extremely hard to cooperate with anyone who views our primary ally (the
Jews/Israel) as their primary enemy. Their Jew obsession and support to Islamic regimes
will severely hinder any direct cooperation. They are blinded by their Jew hate to a
degree where they fail to see the imminent threat to Europe represented by Islam.
The following poll was taken from eNationalist, a rather hardcore NS site:
eNat Poll[4]: Can the Arab world and part of the Islamic world be our allies?
Yes: 44%
No: 52%
This poll indirectly illustrate that the hardcore NS community reject the concept of
European Christian solidarity and thus rejecting the support to our Eastern Christian
cousins (Greek, Maronite, Assyrian, Copt) with the long term goal of creating future
Christian (Islamic free) zones. It also shows that they are generally supportive of
alliances with Islamic countries.
It wasn’t exactly a secret that many in the NS movements rejected Christendom
completely and instead support Odinism. It is however understandable that they view
modern humanist Christendom as weak and therefore unworthy of support (a view which
I partly agree with). However, the solution is not to reject Christianity but rather to
reform Christianity to re-introduce the concepts of “self-defence” as propagated by
former Crusader Popes. Also, we shouldn’t forget that Nazi Germany allied itself with the
Ottoman Caliphate/Turkey on two occasions and supported the Christian Armenian
genocides.
Many NS support the Islamic conspiracy theory that Jews organised the 9/11 attacks and
both reject that the Holocaust took place. In light of these opposing views it’s hard to
imagine that the “new Western European right” will be willing to trust National Socialists.
One of the reasons why hardcore anti-Semites (David Duke would be a case in point) are
unreliable allies is that they hate Jews so much that it shuts down the rational parts of their
brain and they end up making common cause with Muslims, based on mutual hatred.
However, we have certain things in common that shouldn’t be underestimated.
We share the same anti -EU, -UN and –immigration/multiculturalism (Muslim immigration
at least) sentiments and the goal of “preserving European traditions, culture etc” which is
the primary reason why more and more ex-NS people are conforming and joining the
new “European right”.
As a message to those hardcore NS’s who are simply unable to compromise; Conform
and join our armed struggle against the European cultural Marxists/multiculturalists (the
enablers of the Islamisation of Europe), or continue to be sidelined and marginalised.
Multiculturalism is the hole in the dike. Islam is the water pouring in. Everything else
should be irrelevant. Your “Jew” obsession is undermining your own struggle against
multiculturalism.
The cultural conservatives of Western Europe will seize power by 2080, if you want to be
a part of this you will have no choice but to compromise. I would imagine that a
continued Judeo Christian Europe would be considerably better than a European
Caliphate even for the most hardcore NS.
Q: Some “Ghandist/pacifist” members of the conservative resistance will claim
that violence will not solve anything and will instead only give our enemies
more rhetorical ammunition and make it easier for them to gain the moral
ground. They will finally be able to say; “terrorism has no religion”. “By using
terror you are undermining your own struggle and hurting the nationalist
cause”.
How would you react to statements like this?
A: Well, first of all, I would tell him he obviously didn’t have a clue what he was talking
about. Pacifist approaches have been tried in the past; in Lebanon where the Christians
waited until the Muslims made up 60% of the population. The Copts in Egypt have been
relatively pacifist and look what it got them... They are almost extinct due to their
pacifist stance. The same can be said about the Christian Assyrians and Armenians. They
waited and waited, like loyal little dhimmis and “hoped” for a better future, until the day
the Muslims decided to massacre them. Ghandi pacifism worked against the Brits in India
because Christian Europeans aren’t primitive barbarians... However, pacifism doesn’t
work at all against an Islamic entity. As soon as they become a form a majority (and this
will happen unless we can start the deportation campaigns in time) they will strike and
eventually massacre us as history has shown again and again.
A great majority of the European conservatives have chosen dialogue and pacifism since
1955 until today. And what exactly has it gotten us...? During the last 55 years of pacifist
dialogue, the multiculturalists have been allowed to open the gates and flooded our
ancestral lands with 30 million Muslims and they even continue to do so today. Should
we perhaps try dialogue for another 40 years and see what that brings us…? Only a
suicidal individual would accept this. Not acting would be the biggest of all crimes.
The time for dialogue is over for an increasing number of Western Europeans. The
European civil war will progress the coming decades and our traitor enemies will
eventually be defeated and executed.
Q: How did you first get involved in your current activities?
A: Well, I gained awareness of certain issues at that time. My best friend for many years,
a Muslim, had lived his whole life in Oslo West with limited contact with the Norwegian-
Pakistani community. Yet, he and more or less 100% of youngsters like him still failed in
many ways to be integrated. He attended Urdu classes at school from early childhood. He
went to the mosque occasionally after he was 12. Like most Norwegian-Pakistanis he felt
really torn between the Norwegian community and the Pakistani community. However, I
was wrong when assuming that he would chose to follow my path and the Norwegian
way. I understood early that he resented Norwegians and the Norwegian society. Not
because he was jealous, after all he could have conformed if he wanted to. He resented it
because it represented the exact opposite of Islamic ways. Shortly after we broke of
contact he left Jon Trygve and Richard and started hanging out with his cousin and other
Pakistanis. Since then he has been a part of the Pakistani community in Oslo and has, as
far as I know, minimal contact with the Norwegian community. Since then he and his
Muslim friends have beaten and harassed several ethnic Norwegians, one of them being
my friend, Kristoffer.
According to Kristoffer, Arsalan and a bunch of Pakistanis tried to rob him (See: Jizya).
When he refused to pay them, they beat him badly. Luckily, there were witnesses around
and this incident in addition to Arsalans other acts of violence against ethnic Norwegians
resulted in him being incarcerated for 6 months. Another incident, which was confirmed
from reliable sources, happened on New Year’s Eve in Frognerparken, Oslo. Arsalan and
his Pakistani friends allegedly gang raped an ethnic Norwegian girl. I believe this was in
95 or 96. As far as I know, they were never charged with this crime due to the lack of
witnesses.
Muslim girls were off limits to everyone, even the Muslim boys. The only available
“commodity” at this point was therefore ethnic Norwegian girls, referred to as “whores”.
Due to the tolerance indoctrinated through Norwegian upbringing - girls aren’t brought
up to be sceptics, racists or anti-immigrant, just like most boys. They are all brought up
to be very tolerant. As a result, many ethnic Norwegian girls, especially in Muslim
dominated areas, despise ethnic Norwegian boys because they consider them as weak
and inferior with lack of pride, seeing as they are systematically “subdued” by the
“superior Muslim boys”. Ironically, Muslim boys are raised to view Norwegian girls as
inferior “whores”. Their only purpose is to bring pleasure until the Muslim guys are
around 20-25 when they will find a pure, “superior” Muslim girl, a virgin. At this point,
the ethnic Norwegian “whores” is discarded, and most of the girls go back to their old
“tribe”. They are welcomed back in the name of tolerance.
More or less all Muslim parents will tell their sons the following: “You can have fun with
the Norwegian whores, as long as you marry a Muslim”. If, against all odds, a Muslim guy
wants to marry one of these “whores”, she has to convert to Islam – no exception. The
Muslim girls however are guarded by their male family members like they were made of
pure gold. If a Muslim girl, against all odds, engages in a relationship with an ethnic
Norwegian guy, then the Muslim males from her family or “tribe” will kill her or forcefully
take her to their country of origin to be “educated” for a few years. They will attempt to
lure her on a vacation to Pakistan, Morocco, Somalia etc. and possibly kill her there, if
she still refuses to conform. An alternative strategy is to forcefully marry her off to a local
Muslim guy and keep her in their country of origin until she is sufficiently “tied down”
through impregnating her and systematical indoctrination. When she is “tied down” with
2 or more children there isn’t much she can do. Also, it’s not very risky to kill Muslim girls
in Muslim countries as most government officials are corrupt and “very understanding”,
especially in cases where a family wants to “restore their pride”. This is the main reason
why Muslim girls are occasionally sent back to their country of origin, in order to prevent
them from becoming too “European”. They are often sent back to Europe, after several
years of abduction and indoctrination when they are sufficiently subdued and under
control of the Muslim society. It’s not very tempting for Muslim girls to file a divorce and
risk getting frozen out of the Muslim community or risk getting killed when they have 2-4
children.
I also remember from my earlier childhood, two Pakistani and one Turkish girl from
Smestad school, the primary school I attended; Baligha, Modazzer and Eilif. Baligha was
Faizals, my friend’s, sister, I didn’t know Modazzer although she was my neighbour, but I
used to play with Eilif, Onors sister. At that time there were three Pakistani families in
that area and one Turkish, all except the latter lived in publicly subsidised apartments, in
accordance with the government’s integration program. I remember the day when
Modazzers chair was empty. We didn’t get an answer from our teacher regarding her
whereabouts. She was supposed to have returned from her summer vacation in Pakistan.
The next year Eilif was sent to Turkey. I heard her father thought she had become “too
Norwegian”. A few years later, the exact same thing happened with Baligha. One day she
didn’t show up for school after her vacation in Pakistan. I was only 10 years old at that
time and didn’t really know what was going on. In retrospect I know that they were sent
back to their country of origin, and no one as far as I know has heard from them again.
They were most likely either married away at young age or killed. I know exactly where
those families live(d) and I know for a fact that they vanished and didn’t return for
several years. At this point I knew nothing about Islam. I only learned at school that
Islam was peaceful and tolerant, very similar to Christianity. I was therefore unable to
make the correct conclusions and identify that both Baligha and Modazzer had in fact
been abducted.
Anyway, back to the topic. When I was around 16-17 years old I joined the Progress
Party Youth organisation (FpU) as they were anti-immigration and pro-free-market. Every
single journalist in the country regarded them as racist because of their anti-immigration
program. FrP were under constant attacks from every single media organisation, NGO’s
and all the other political parties. They were called racists and Nazis and were generally
labelled as “fascist pigs”. FrP appealed to me because I had experienced the hypocrisy in
society first hand and I knew already then that they were the only party who opposed
multiculturalism.
It became obvious to me early on that the hypocrisy in society was so prevalent and
overwhelming. I now started to see the connection between Islam, Western media, the
extreme left and the government. I started studying Islamism, Socialism, egalitarianism
and other directions of Political Science and became more aware of what was going on. I
then, for the first time, understood why I hadn’t learned anything of relevance about
Islam at school, and the motives for suppressing the truth on these issues – political
correctness.
Around year 2000 I realised that the democratic struggle against the Islamisation of
Europe, European multiculturalism was lost. It had gone too far. It is simply not possible
to compete democratically with regimes who import millions of voters. 40 years of
dialogue with the cultural Marxists/multiculturalists had ended up as a disaster. It would
now only take 50-70 years before we, the Europeans are in a minority. As soon as I
realised this I decided to explore alternative forms of opposition. Protesting is saying that
you disagree. Resistance is saying you will put a stop to this. I decided I wanted to join
the resistance movement.
However, the main problem then was that there weren’t any alternatives for me at all.
There weren’t any known armed cultural conservative, or Christian, anti-Jihad
movements.
An NS or racist/anti Jewish movement was completely out of the question, as they
represented much of what I oppose. I came in contact with Serbian cultural conservatives
through the internet. This initial contact would eventually result in my contact with
several key individuals all over Europe and the forming of the group who would later
establish the military order and tribunal, PCCTS, Knights Templar. I remember they did a
complete screening and background check to ensure I was of the desired calibre. Two of
them had reservations against inviting me due to my young age but the leader of the
group insisted on my candidature. According to one of them, they were considering
several hundred individuals throughout Europe for a training course. I met with them for
the first time in London and later on two occasions in Balticum. I had the privilege of
meeting one of the greatest living war heroes of Europe at the time, a Serbian crusader
and war hero who had killed many Muslims in battle. Due to EU persecution for alleged
crimes against Muslims he was living at one point in Liberia. I visited him in Monrovia
once, just before the founding session in London, 2002.
I was the youngest one there, 23 years old at the time. One of the key founders
instructed the rest of the group about several topics related to the goal of the
organisation. I believe I scribbled down more than 50 full pages of notes regarding all
possible related topics. Much of these notes are forwarded in the book 2083. It was
basically a detailed long term plan on how to seize power in Western Europe. I did not
fully comprehend at the time how privileged I was to be in the company of some of the
most brilliant political and military tacticians of Europe. Some of us were unfamiliar with
each other beforehand so I guess we all took a high risk meeting face to face. There were
only 5 people in London re-founding the order and tribunal (1 by proxy) but there were
around 25-30 attending in Balticum during the two sessions, individuals from all over
Europe; Germany, France, Sweden, the UK, Denmark, Balticum, Benelux, Spain, Italy,
Greece, Hungary, Austria, Armenia, Lebanon and Russia. Electronic or telephonic
communication was completely prohibited, before, during and after the meetings. On our
last meeting it was emphasised clearly that we cut off contact indefinitely. Any type of
contact with other cells was strictly prohibited.
This was not sessions were regular combat cells were created. It was more like a training
course for pioneer cell commanders. We were not instructed to attack specific targets,
quite the opposite. We were encouraged to rather use the information distributed to
contribute to build and expand the so called ”cultural conservative anti-Jihad movement,
either through spreading propaganda, provide funding for the creation of new groups
through various forums or by recruiting other people directly. All individuals attending the
sessions learned about PCCTS, the Knights Templar but they were not specifically
instructed to represent that particular order and tribunal. Everyone was encouraged but
at the end, it was their own decision how they decided to manifest their resistance. A
special emphasis was put on the long term nature of the struggle (50-100 years). Our
task was to contribute to a long term approach and not to act prematurely. If there was a
large scale attack the next 10 years it was said, we should avoid any immediate follow up
attacks as it would negate the shock effect of the subsequent attacks. A large successful
attack every 5-12 years was optimal depending on available forces.
This was not a stereotypical “right wing” meeting full of underprivileged racist skinheads
with a short temper, but quite the opposite. Most of them were successful entrepreneurs,
business or political leaders, some with families, most of them Christian conservatives
but also some agnostics and even atheists. I remember it struck me how impressed I
was regarding how they had set up the screening parameters (for accepting new
candidates). They obviously wanted resourceful pragmatical individuals who were able to
keep information away from their loved ones and who were not in any way flagged by
their governments. Every one of them was supportive of a Judeo Christian Europe and
did not have any reservations against cooperating with non-European Christians Hindu or
Buddhist nationalists. I had or have a relatively close relationship with at least one of
them, an Englishman, who became my mentor. He was the one who first described the
“perfect knight” and had written the initial fundament for this compendium. I was asked,
not only once but twice, by my mentor; let’s call him Richard, to write a second edition of
his compendium about the new European Knighthood. As such, I spent several years to
create an economic platform which would allow me to study and write a second edition.
And as of now, I have spent more than three years completing this second edition.
Perhaps, someone out there will be able to contribute by creating a third edition one day.
Q: What tipped the scales for you? What single event made you decide you
wanted to continue planning and moving on with the assault?
A: For me, personally, it was my government’s involvement in the attacks on Serbia
(NATO bombings in 1999) several years back. It was completely unacceptable how the
US and Western European regimes bombed our Serbian brothers. All they wanted was to
drive Islam out by deporting the Albanian Muslims back to Albania. When the Albanians
refused, they really didn’t have any choice but to use military force. By disallowing the
Serbians the right for self-determination over their sovereign territory they indirectly dug
a grave for Europe. A future where several Mini-Pakistan’s would eventually will be
created in every Western European capital. This is unacceptable, completely
unacceptable.
There have been several issues that have reaffirmed my beliefs since then. Among them;
my governments cowardly handling of the Muhammad Cartoon issue and their decision to
award the Nobel peace prize to an Islamic terrorist (Arafat) and appeasers of Islam.
There have been tens of other issues. My government and our media capitulated to Islam
several years ago, after the Rushdie event. Since then, it has gone downhill. Thousands
of Muslims pouring in annually through our Asylum institution, or by family reunification.
The situation is just chaotic. These suicidal traitors must be stopped.
Q: How did you proceed after these sessions in 2002-2004?
A: I understood early that in order to be able to work full time with what you want, you
need to gain economical independence. I was not rich at the time and I had to somehow
find a way to earn enough funds to be able to contribute.
Late in 2002 I was working full time as a mid level leader in a customer service company.
At the same time, I started a company that focused on outsourcing of programming
services. It went quite well. And around May 2003 I quit my day job to focus entirely on
my business. The next three years i worked an average 12 hours per day with my
company; E-Commerce Group. At one point I had 6 employees, 2 in Norway, 2 in Russia,
1 in Romania and one in Indonesia. I registered an off shore company and several off
shore bank accounts in order to avoid excessive state taxation (anonymous debit cards
and ATM`s ftw). This way, I could build up funds faster. My initial plan was to earn at
least 5 million, then use the acquired funds to start a pan-European conservative
movement or plan an advanced operation. It started out great and I earned my first mill
(NOK) at the age of 24 which peaked at 4 million, 12 months later. In 2005 and 2006,
recession hit my industry which resulted in lower income margins. As a result I decided
to discontinue my company and instead salvage all the funds I could. The most cost
efficient way of doing this in my country is to file for bankruptcy, which I did. I had now
completed my goal and I had enough funding to proceed with planning of an assault
operation.
I spent three years were I focused on writing the compendium, 2083. During a 12 month
period in the beginning, I also played World of Warcraft part time (which had been a
dream for some time – hardcore raiding. I lived very ascetic and relatively isolated in
this period. These three years would also contribute to detach myself from my “old life”.
It’s a process I used in order to isolate myself from most of my network, in preparation
for the coming operation. I feel that this period was needed in order to completely
”detach myself from “the game”, my “former shallow consumerist lifestyle ” in order to
ensure full focus on the matters at hand.
Comment: Normally I find it quite pathetic to brag about how much one has earned. The
only reason I mentioned it is because the cultural Marxist/ multiculturalist government
will likely try to attempt to “assassinate my character” by labelling me as an “insane,
inbred, pedophile Nazi loser”.
I guess it should also be noted that I did in fact lose 2 million NOK on stock speculation
during the period 2005-2008 leaving me with approximately 2 million (half a million went
to tax). Most of my funds were channelled through the company; Brentwood Solutions
Ltd (and four other offshore accounts) which again channelled the funds to my
Norwegian corporation; E-Commerce Group AS and to anonymous debit cards. Despite
the fact that I used an offshore company/accounts. In retrospect I see that I made
certain mistakes which has pressured my budget. I had approximately one million NOK
(170 000 Euro) to spend on both writing the book and finance the operation. I spent
more funds during the creation of the compendium leaving me with approximately
40 000 Euro plus credit for the operation.
Q: Why did you choose an allegiance to a group with Christian values and pan-
European goals instead of a purely national/regional group?
A: Many have asked this question. My choice has nothing to do with the fact that I am
not proud of my own traditions and heritage. My choice was based purely pragmatism.
All Europeans are in this boat together so we must choose a more moderate platform
that can appeal to a great number of Europeans – preferably up to 50% (realistically up
to 35%). Choosing a local/national group would be counterproductive as all the groups I
am familiar with are Odinist orientated and not Christian identity groups. It is essential
that we choose a banner that has the potential to appeal towards central and southern
Europeans as well. I understand that many nationalists oppose Christianity and do not
wish to fight under the banner of a cross. Furthermore, I understand that many
nationalists only care for their own nation and culture. However, all Western Europeans
are in the same situation, facing the same problems so it would be illogical not to
cooperate and focus on pan-European organizations. Pooling resources and especially
knowledge is essential. Obviously, this cannot be achieved if you require that your
potential members follow un-appealing principles and codes such as that of the national
anarchists (at least many of them). A hateful ideology (white supremacist), death metal,
Odinism, conspiracy theories does NOT have mass appeal. Some of the local nationalist
factions have very controversial views and lifestyles that do not appeal to a broad specter
of people. This is in a way understandable as it can be viewed as indirect cultural
defensive mechanisms as a result of decades of persecution from local authorities. Yet, so
called national anarchists will never be potent enough unless they pool their knowledge
base with pan-European organisations. Mass appeal should be the most essential factor
in this strategy. Obviously, the PCCTS, Knights Templar does not have mass appeal as we
are a relatively cynical/cruel/goal oriented armed resistance group. However, our
primary foundational principles (a majority of them) still have mass appeal and are
supported by as many as 50-60% of all Europeans. The reason for this is due to the fact
that we oppose ALL hate ideologies and we consider it illogical to fight hate with hate. Of
course, this does not mean that we will use less brutal methods in our operations. It only
means that our foundational ideological principles will have mass appeal to a majority of
Europeans.
In comparison, the foundational principles of National Socialism or white supremacy
groups in general does not have mass appeal and is supported by less than 10%, in
many countries less than 5%.
And yes, we are aware that many NS will view us as sellouts and even traitors. Many
believe that we are race traitors for offering any non-Muslim minority group the
opportunity to fight with us and for flagging support to Zionism (Israeli nationalism) in
our foundational principles. To some national socialists, this is high treason and can never
be accepted. According to these hardcore national socialists we are just as bad as the
Marxists.
Needless to say, at the end of the day, we have the sympathy of the European peoples,
while they have considerably less support.
Q: I guess you wanted to tell your friends about this. Has it been hard to live a
“double life”, hiding your true political conservative revolutionary convictions?
A: At first it was extremely hard to avoid the temptation to tell your closest friends. I
decided however to withhold all relevant information from them and everyone, not
because I didn’t trust them, but rather because I wanted to avoid incriminating them.
Revealing sensitive information to any of them would put them in a difficult spot, because
they would be required by law to report this info to the authorities. It would also pose a
serious threat to me if they decided to tell anyone. Adding any cell commanders on MSN
or other online networks would be completely idiotic and reckless and would violate my
oath. As such, I therefore only corresponded with moderate people who had no clue
whatsoever about my clandestine activities. After all, a Justiciar Knight is not an
ideologically insecure individual. A Justiciar Knight does not rely on constant babysitting
or “patting on the back”. He is self driven and ideologically confident with proven daily
rituals/meditation which keeps him going.
A couple of my friends have their suspicions though. However, I have managed to
channel these suspicions far away from relating to my political convictions. Instead they
suspect that I am playing WoW (and trying to hide it) and a couple of them believe that I
have chosen semi-isolation because of some alleged homosexual relationship which they
suspect I am trying to hide, LOL. Quite hilarious, as I am 100% hetero, but they may
continue to believe what they want as it prevents them from asking more questions)
My goal is obviously to prevent my closest network from asking specific questions, and it
has worked perfectly so far.
Q: What motivates you? How have you managed to stay focused and motivated
for more than 8 years? Is it bitterness and hate towards the so called ”cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist elites” or perhaps towards Islam?
A: No, not at all. In fact, if they (the cultural Marxists) against all odds renounced
multiculturalism today, halted all Muslim immigration and started deportation of all
Muslims I would forgive them for their past crimes, and I think most Europeans would as
well, despite the fact that more than 15 000 Europeans have died and 500 000 have
been raped and/or ravaged physically or mentally due to multiculturalism. If they refuse
to surrender before 2020 it will be no turning back. We will eventually annihilate every
single one of them. They should know this so I hope they surrender before the deadline.
If they continue to defy the will of Europeans for decades to come and force Europe to
the brink of catastrophe, they will be shown no mercy. It will be an extremely bloody
reckoning and thousands of them will most likely be executed.
Secondly, I don’t hate Muslims at all. I acknowledge that there are magnificent Muslim
individuals in Europe. In fact, I have had several Muslim friends over the years, some of
which I still respect. This does not mean however that I will accept an Islamic presence
in Europe. Muslim individuals who do not assimilate 100% within 2020 will be deported
as soon as we manage to seize power.
Although I do admit that I am disgusted by the current development, I would rather say
I’m driven by my love for Europe, European culture and all Europeans. This does not
mean that I oppose diversity. But appreciating diversity does not mean that you support
genocide of your own culture and people by accepting f example Islamic Demographic
Warfare.
Q: How would you view your own current political standpoints 15 years ago?
A: I would most likely think I was a complete nut job due to the fact that I was ignorant
about most issues then. But if you actually take the time to study the non-PC
documentation available you cannot avoid making many of the same conclusions I have
made today.
Fighting for your people’s survival, when threatened, is the most logical thing to do to.
Defending your people and culture from genocide is the most basic and recognised
human right and one of few causes actually worth dying for. I do not regret any of my
actions or major life choices. In fact, I would do it all again, without any hesitation, if I
was given the chance.
Q: You know that a large majority of people will end up viewing you as a
complete nut right, despite your own and others efforts to justify violence?
A: I am fully aware that the media will attempt to label me as a nut. This is the most
common strategy of combating political dissidents. I know that the cultural Marxists and
the full force of the European multiculturalist mainstream media will do everything within
their power to portray people like me as nothing more than delusional nut jobs. After all
it’s their job to protect their interests. And they will succeed to a certain degree (we are
currently too disorganised to counter their powerful propaganda machinery). I am fully
aware that our current views are considered extreme. However, more spectacular
operations will burden them and force public discussion. It will be increasingly harder for
them to manipulate and distort the truth, or to prevent people from knowing what is
going on. We are using brutal means because we have tried absolutely everything else.
Within the boundaries of the EUSSR totalitarian system, we are left no choice.
With time (in phase 2 when the Muslims have reached 20-50%) more and more people
will dig deeper into our material and understand that we are right.
Q: But doesn’t it worry you that 95% of all Europeans will openly detest you
and call you a murderer and a terrorist?
A: It’s human nature to be selfish, to seek admiration, love and affection. This is why
very few people will have the self insight, the ideological and moral confidence and
strength to act selflessly on behalf of their own countrymen on their own initiative
without a solid hierarchical organisation or country supporting and encouraging them. We
have taken these thankless tasks upon ourselves because we possess these traits; the
self insight, the ideological and moral confidence and strenght and we are willing to
sacrifice our lives for our brothers and sisters, even though they will openly detest us. It
can be illustrated like a parent spanking their ignorant child. The child will hate their
parents there and then but in time they will understand that their only intention is to
protect them. In phase 2 and 3, many of these brothers and sisters will hold our banner
and chant our hymns because they finally understand.
Q: How do you manage to motivate yourself considering the fact that you are
planning a large operation alone, with no one to confide in?
A: It has been a long term process since I first decided I wanted to contribute. But it’s
not like I have been isolated for years. I have almost lived a normal life up until now. I
still have a close relationship with my friends and family, just not as tight as it used to
be. As for my current situation, I have been working on this book now for almost two
years. It’s essential that you reward yourself and enjoy life in this period. You can do
things you normally wouldn’t have done. You can basically live a normal life if you chose
to; you just have to be extra careful. I have been practising certain rituals and
meditation to strengthen my beliefs and convictions. For me, the most common ritual is
taking a long walk listening to my favourite music on my Ipod. I just love vocal
Elektronika, very powerful. This is done while brainstorming for new angles I might have
missed and mentally simulating every detail of the operation. Do whatever works for you.
The most important thing is being ready when the day comes, to not hesitate.
Overcoming your fear is the most difficult task. It’s essential to prepare yourself mentally
for this.
Q: What great nationalist statesmen inspire you?
A: Winston Churchill, Otto von Bismarck
However, our role models MUST be the great nationalist struggles of the past, because
politics is nothing at all but the historical process at work in the present. So we need to
study the Wind of Change that blew through Africa in the 1950s, now that we too are
living under anti-European discrimination in the EU Colonial Empires (EUSSR). Study Mao
Tse-Dong (The Great Helmsman), once a role model for the Left, now a possible Rightist
role model: leader of China's National Revival. Was he ever a Communist at all?
Study Otto von Bismarck, not Adolf (the former was precursor of the modern Right, the
latter precursor of the contemporary left). Study the Italian Risorgimento of the 19th
century, which was a vast movement of National Revival (not a conspiracy by small
elites, as the textbooks say) and an Alliance between the aristocratic Right (Count
Cavour[1] and King Victor Emmanuel[2]) and the Revolutionary Left (Garibaldi[3]). And
look at Ataturk's revival of Turkey after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire (led by the
military). Ireland and Israel have had Nationalist struggles in the last century we can
very usefully learn from. In each case, a handful of visionaries raised whole nations, after
centuries (even millennia) of oppression. Theodor Herzl, founder of Zionism, was
ridiculed and died after only 8 years in politics, convinced of his own failure.
Remember the spider in Robert the Bruce's cave: each time its web was blown away, it
wove again and Bruce was inspired to re-weave the web of Scots Nationhood: still going
strong 780 years later.
We must study Athelstan, Alfred and Edgar of Wessex, who did not give up, just because
everyone told him that England was finished. Neither Boudicca, nor Caractacus should be
our heroes, because they both failed quickly and miserably. It was Cassivellaunus who
defeated Caesar two years running and Calgacus who saved Albion (North Britain) from
the Romans. For 465 years the Romans were occupying half of Britain: the brave British
patriots never gave up resistance (12 Vietnams laid end to end) and the Romans were
eventually driven out.
Q: Can the mainstream media prevent a continued right wing consolidation?
A: They will continue with their old strategies, labelling everyone who opposes the
Islamisation of Europe/European multiculturalism as Nazi’s and racists.
Fjordman illustrates it well:
“The thinking seems to be that if you scratch any random European there is usually a Nazi
lurking underneath, just waiting to get out. There are only two possible versions of
Europeans: the surrender-monkeys and the Nazis. If we are not the former, then it follows
by logic that we have to be the latter. This attitude betrays an all-pervasive hatred that
demonises absolutely anything Europeans do to protect their dignity and heritage. “
This will work for them as long as the government manages to keep unemployment low
and maintain the current level of welfare. Unfortunately for them, it is just a matter of
time before the Western European economies completely collapses. I know for a fact that
it will happen within 20-70 years.
Q: Name seven traits you consider most important as a cell operative:
A: Ideological confidence, patience, the ability to motivate yourself, keeping sensitive
information to yourself, resourcefulness, being pragmatical and insightfulness in your
own psyche.
Q: What should be our civilisational objectives, how do you envision a perfect
Europe?
A: “Logic” and rationalist thought (a certain degree of national Darwinism) should be the
fundament of our societies. I support the propagation of collective rational thought but
not necessarily on a personal level. Because, if a woman was purely rational, she would
choose to not have babies at all, and instead live her life in a purely egotistical manner.
We should strive to become a civilisation where the individual’s acquisition of wealth
would no longer be the driving force in our lives. Instead, we would focus much more of
our resources to better ourselves and our communities by channelling at least 20% of the
budget to research, science and technology. Good welfare arrangements combined with
embracing the ideal of perfection requires a solid cooperation/symbiosis (social cohesion)
and is only possible in a monoculture where everyone has complete confidence to
everyone. The problem with today’s society is that it has become fanatically egalitarian.
In our quest to appease everyone (except the traditional cultural group) we have created
a habit and tradition of cheering mediocrity and weakness. Your position in the “victim
hierarchy” decides your position in society. It’s an illogical and self defeating
development.
As for the future servant class; I have described this in another chapter (insourcing of
labour for 6 month contracts offering them less than 20% of Western salaries). This
servant class model ensures that all European citizens is treated with decency and
offered every possibility to advance. However, it will be almost impossible to gain
citizenship for non-European immigrants.
Q: Can you describe your childhood?
A: My father, Jens Breivik, had three children from a former marriage; Erik, Jan and Nina
while my mother, Wenche Behring had a daughter from a past relationship; Elisabeth. My
parents divorced when I was 1 years old. Me, my sister and my parents; Wenche (a
nurse), Jens (siviløkonom) was living in London at the time as he worked as a diplomat
for the Royal Norwegian Embassy in London (and later Paris). Jens stayed in London and
later married Tove Øvermo who also worked in the Royal Norwegian Embassy. Wenche,
Elisabeth and myself moved back to Oslo and settled on Skøyen, Oslo West. My mother,
Wenche met my stepfather, Tore, who was a captain in the Norwegian Army. My
stepmother, Tove, later became a Vice Consul and my father was a Commercial
Councellor for the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs abroad, first in London and
then in Paris.
My parents were not politically active but supported the policies of the Norwegian Labour
Party which was common for most individuals working in the public sector. My stepfather,
Tore, was a moderately right wing while my stepmother, Tove, was a moderate cultural
Marxist and feminist. My mom, Wenche, was an apolitical moderate feminist.
Jens and Tove wanted child custody and wanted to raise me in Paris. They lost the child
custody case in an Oslo court a few years later.
I visited Jens and Tove on a regular basis in Paris and at our summer house/cottage in
Normandie, FR and Notodden, NO until they divorced when I was 12. I had a good
relationship with him and his new wife at the time, Tove Øvermo, until I was 15. I still
have contact with Tove until this day but have not spoken to my father since he isolated
himself when I was 15 (he wasn’t very happy about my graffiti phase from 13-16. He
has four children but has cut contact with all of them so it is pretty clear whose fault that
was. I don’t carry any grudge but a couple of my half siblings do. The thing is that he is
just not very good with people. I tried contacting him five years ago but he said he was
not mentally prepared for a reunion due to various factors, his poor health being one.
Tore, my stepfather, worked as a major in the Norwegian military and is now retired. I
still have contact with him although now he spends most his time (retirement) with
prostitutes in Thailand. He is a very primitive sexual beast, but at the same time a very
likable and good guy. I can’t say I approve of that lifestyle although I can’t really blame
him when I see today’s Marxist social structures. So all in all, I consider myself privileged
and I feel I have had a privileged upbringing with responsible and intelligent people
around me. I do not approve of the super-liberal, matriarchal upbringing though as it
completely lacked discipline and has contributed to feminise me to a certain degree.
I haven’t really had any negative experiences in my childhood in any way. I had way too
much freedom though if anything. I used to visit my father annually until I was 16. So
guess I came from a typical Norwegian middle class family. We never had any economical
troubles.
I have a good relationship with my four half siblings, Nina, Erik and Jan but especially
Elisabeth. We get together a couple of times a year. Elisabeth moved to Los Angeles 14
years ago and is now settled down with two kids, Kaia and Tyler. I talk to her once a
month. Both she and her husband are moderately conservative but generally live their
life as apolitical career cynicists. Two of my other half siblings are conservative, one
moderately conservative. They are generally apolitical but I am very happy for the fact
that a majority of my extended family are intelligent and relatively anti-Marxist. Erik’s
girlfriend though is a super-feminist and quite radical Marxist. We have had some very
interesting conversations where she has almost physically strangled me
Q: What was your relationship with the so called neo-Nazis, skinheads and right
wing people at that time?
A: Being so called neo-Nazi, skinhead or right wing in general meant that you were into
Metal rock. I hated Metal rock and I hate it even today. I knew a few guys from my age
group growing up, Edward, Nils and 5 others. They attended the same school as us and a
couple of them were uniformed skinheads at this time. I know they never really believed
in the National Socialist ideology, they were more anti-immigrant and wanted to state a
point rather than anything else. I had known them vaguely for several years but I didn’t
have a lot in common with them. Most people at my school had a good relationship with
them, myself included. They didn’t cause any problems, weren’t violent and respected
the rules, unlike us. The exception was Arsalan who had a clash with Edward at one time.
Arsalan was one of the very few Pakistanis at my school.
As for the right wing community at that time, it was simple. They loved metal and we
loved hip-hop. Being into the very small right wing community or the larger mainstream
rock community meant Goth girls and hard rock. I disliked both. The big irony was that
they; Edward and his friends, were a lot more “normal” than us during this period. They
were peaceful while we were violent. They followed the law and rules while we broke the
law and ignored the rules again and again. At the same time, the hip-hop community was
cheered by the media, praised as the pinnacle of tolerance among the new generation,
while THEY were condemned for their political views, systematically harassed and beaten
by non-white gangs, extremist Marxist gangs (Blitz etc) and the police. It’s quite ironic
and shamefull.
The irony and hypocrisy becomes absolute considering the fact that a large core of the
hip-hop movement through rappers like Tupac, Nas, Lauryn Hill or other artists like Bob
Marley etc. are in essence quite racist and anti-European in nature. Yet, millions of ethnic
European youths love their music. We obviously didn’t create these rules. We just chose
to go with the flow at that time as most people did and still do today. The deeper
meaning of their texts didn’t bother us much.
The lefties/hip-hop movement, including the Pakistani gangs and other minority gangs –
in cooperation with SOS Rasisme and Blitz were notorically and systematically violent,
even racist and discriminating towards ethnic Norwegian youths and anti-immigrant
individuals. They abused drugs and many were involved in criminal activity, yet cheered
by the media because of their “tolerance” and so called “anti-racist” attitude.
Intolerance, racism and acts of Jihad were tolerated against native Norwegians as the
perpetrators were categorised as victims by default (as minorities). They were seldom
punished properly.
I remember the occasional crackdowns on right wing youth movements during this
period. The police raided them several times, called their parents and invested a lot of
resources on squashing the right wing movement all over Norway. Blitz and other
extreme left, SOS Rasisme and the hip-hop community on the other hand received public
funding. The Blitz house, a building they had occupied a few decades earlier, was
subsidised and under protection by the government in Oslo and still is even today. They
are often referred to as the “storm troops” of the Norwegian Labour Party. The
government subsidy of the apartment block were Blitz resides equates to more than 3
million USD per year alone. The violent Marxist group “SOS Rasisme” receives 2-3 million
NOK annually. It’s disgusting.
Anyway, at this time I was 16 years old. I had been somewhat political aware for 2-3
years already and I had grown to be a passive “anti-racist” but against non-Western
immigration. However, the fact that I opposed non-Western immigration automatically
meant that I had become a “racist” according to the definitions of the “politically correct
elites” and the leftists. I therefore kept this to myself.
Q: You said you were into genealogy?
A: I am very proud of my Viking heritage. My name, Breivik, is a location name from
northern Norway, and can be dated back to even before the Viking era. Behring is a pre-
Christian Germanic name which is derived from Behr, the Germanic word for Bear (or
“those who are protected by the bear”). Anders (Andreas) is the Scandinavian equivalent
of; English: Andrew, Greek: Andreus, Italian: Andrea, Russian: Andrey. I have managed
to trace the Behring side of my family tree back to around 1680 and know that the origin
of the name reaches all the way back to a Teutonic German family which used the Bear in
their coat of arms. There is a church in Southern Germany that carries my family’s coat
of arms (a black bear on yellow background) or the coat of arms of my ancestor,
Behr/Ber/Bear. It is likely that I am somehow related to the great Danish explorer Bering
(Bering Island, Bering strait, Bering sea) although I have been unable to trace my lineage
to his particular family branch. As the German Ber/Bear clan grew up to a millennia ago,
they added an h and eventually “ring” to establish a distinction between the various
related families. Animal names violated the principles of Christendom so adding various
endings might have been as a result of the increasing convertion to Christianity
approximately a thousand years ago.
Q: Why did you decide not to formalise your education?
A: I first got involved with the armed European Resistance Movement when I was 21/22
years old, in 2001/2002. At this point I had made no concluding decisions whether to go
ahead with any specific operation or not. I still felt I had to learn more. The nature of the
network structure at that point allowed for a substantial degree of self-organisation. I
didn’t have to swear to any specific operation. We only swore to the pre-defined
principles which included among other things to protect the free peoples of Europe by
working for the liberation of Western Europe from the grasp of cultural Marxist hegemony
(I have specified this more accurately in another chapter). When I decided to go ahead
with the operation in 2002/2003 there were still several opportunities to back down.
Formalising my education and to continue official studies at a registered university would
be counter-productive as it would side track my involvement in other sub-tasks. I would
not have enough time to run my company and building a financial platform for a future
operation. Also, there would be no professor within the field of political science that
would approve my thesis on master/PhD level. More or less every professor in that field
is politically correct/cultural Marxists and would reject any thesis/work presented of
cultural conservative and especially revolutionary nature. Formalising your education is
all about prestige and the possibility of working for various organisations. I care little
about prestige and even less for the opportunities to work for “publicly approved”
politically correct entities. It was therefore no incentive whatsoever for me to invest so
many of my resources in formalising my education in any of the fields that interested me.
Q: Do you consider yourself as an optimist as for the future of Europe?
A: I’m very optimistic. The question we must ask ourselves is; how do we defeat a self-
defeating ideology? It’s rather self explanatory; cultural Marxism/ multiculturalism,
especially in combination with Islam, will defeat itself. The reasoning behind this claim is
that the cultural Marxist and Islamic alliance will not last. As soon as Islam reaches a few
percent it begins to show signs of chauvinism which is the essence of any fascist, racist
and imperialistic ideology. Muslims who follow the Quran are simply too aggressive and
impatient and they will simply be unable to keep the peace for long. Ghettofication in
combination with demographical warfare (which is in fact the very definition of indirect
ethnic cleansing) will go hand in hand with systematical rape, ravaging, brutalisation
and killing of us non-Muslims. One point in the future a window of opportunity will arise for
us. Until that day comes, we must prepare, plan, recruit, arm ourselves through self
education but also by acquiring weapons and armour. We must educate and enlighten as
many Europeans as possible but most importantly continue the armed resistance. When
that window of opportunity comes, we must be ready to seize political and military
control using all means necessary. When the time comes, we must not hesitate, we must
risk everything for the chance to gain our freedom and secure the freedom for our
kinsmen once more.
I know I will die fighting the overwhelming cultural Marxists/multiculturalist forces in
phase 1 and that’s not a problem for me at all. I have prepared mentally for a very long
time and I will gladly sacrifice my life for the benefit of my European brothers and sisters.
My love for them exceeds my own self serving interests. That’s not the kind of person I
used to be, but it’s the type of person I have become. My hate and contempt for the
cultural Marxists/multiculturalist doctrines is definitely there. However, as with most
individuals, love and hate fuels us. Passion and motivation is converted into action. Some
people are overwhelmed with hate or love. It’s essential that we don’t allow the passion
to control us. It’s critical that we are cool and act rationally with a long term perspective.
Our day will come, have no doubt about it. Just act rationally in the mean time and don’t
sell your life cheaply. Make sure you have many children or fight for the armed resistance
movement. You may fight with the pen or with the sword, every effort counts!
Q: Are you a religious man, and should science take priority over the teachings
of the Bible?
A: My parents, being rather secular wanted to give me the choice in regards to religion.
At the age of 15 I chose to be baptised and confirmed in the Norwegian State Church. I
consider myself to be 100% Christian. However, I strongly object to the current suicidal
path of the Catholic Church but especially the Protestant Church. I support a Church that
believes in self defence and who are willing to fight for its principles and values, at least
resist the efforts put forth to exterminate it gradually. The Catholic and Protestant Church
are both cheering their own annihilation considering the fact that they embrace the
ongoing inter-faith dialogue and the appeasement of Islam. The current Church elite has
shown its suicidal face, as vividly demonstrated last year by the archbishop of
Canterbury's speech contemplating the legitimacy of Shariah in parts of Britain.
I trust that the future leadership of a European cultural conservative hegemony in Europe
will ensure that the current Church leadership are replaced and the systems somewhat
reformed. We must have a Church leadership who supports a future Crusade with the
intention of liberating the Balkans, Anatolia and creating three Christian states in the
Middle East. Efforts should be made to facilitate the de-construction of the Protestant
Church whose members should convert back to Catholicism. The Protestant Church had
an important role once but its original goals have been accomplished and have
contributed to reform the Catholic Church as well. Europe should have a united Church
lead by a just and non-suicidal Pope who is willing to fight for the security of his subjects,
especially in regards to Islamic atrocities.
I fully support that the Church gains more or less monopoly on religion in Europe
(government policies, school curriculum etc at least) in addition to granting the Church
several concessions which have been taken from them the last decades.
As for the Church and science, it is essential that science takes an undisputed precedence
over biblical teachings. Europe has always been the cradle of science and it must always
continue to be that way. Regarding my personal relationship with God, I guess I’m not an
excessively religious man. I am first and foremost a man of logic. However, I
am a supporter of a monocultural Christian Europe.
Q: Which types of individuals and which current national political system do you
admire the most?
A: As for individuals, I admire anyone who contributes to further humanity scientifically,
culturally, technologically, militarily and economically. I admire individuals who act
selflessly and/or contribute through personal sacrifice in one way or the other.
As for current national political systems, I especially admire the Japanese, South Korean
and Taiwanese system. These three countries reject multiculturalism outright and have
instead focused on maintaining and protecting their monoculture. They have managed to
copy and implement the most advantageous mechanics from Europe and the US (in
terms of educational, scientific, technological and economical mechanics) but have at the
same time rejected cultural Marxism to a large degree. There is still room for
improvement but they have managed to adapt quite well in the world and should be
viewed as an inspiration for future cultural conservative governments.
Q: Why don’t you mention the liberation of the US (from multiculturalism,
suicidal humanism and Islamisation) in your book?
A: It is not our place to dictate or tell our European-American brothers and sisters what
to do or not do. Whatever they decide, we Europeans will support them 100%. But of
course, we are aware that they are in a somewhat similar situation. The democrats are
supporting mass-Muslim immigration for the votes, while the Republicans want cheap
labour. They do not have any political party at all representing them. However, we know
that they are monitoring the European situation closely and are thus likely to respond
based on our course of action. When the traitor government in France falls within the
next seven decades it will act as a domino effect which might also result in an American
right wing coup.
Q: Who is your favourite contemporary author and why?
A: That would be Fjordman. Despite a couple of attempts, I have not been able to meet
with him even though he is Norwegian. He is quite paranoid which is understandable to a
certain degree I guess. Many have asked if I am Fjordman, but this is obviously not the
case. To be honest, I had no idea who he was until I was six months into my current
compendium, “2083”. At that time I had researched most of the primary and secondary
topics for my book. To my great surprise I found that Fjordman had written about many
of the same topics I was writing about. The only difference being that he was a
professional essay writer and I was not. Our views are quite similar with the exception of
me being an actual armed resistance fighter. I had researched hundreds of writers in the
past, many of whom are good. However, I really felt a connection to Fjordmans essays.
He is most likely the most talented right wing essay writer in Europe. Another factor that
separates him from everyone else is that he really wants to contribute. He writes because
he really wants to contribute to change Europe, unlike many other right wing intellectuals
who are more concerned about feeding their egos. I have the impression that some are
opportunists who simply want to milk the cow for as long as possible. People that really
want change will not trademark their work indefinitely but instead see that their
intellectual works are distributed to as many Europeans as possible on as many
languages as possible. This is not possible as long as the authors on the field trademark
their intellectual work and do whatever they can to limit the distribution. I can
understand that they need to earn enough for food and rent etc. However, if they want to
make a real difference instead of being viewed as “intellectual war profiteers and
opportunists” they will have to contribute by making their intellectual property available
for all Europeans. We are in the middle of the war and many of them are not contributing
as much as they could.
Fjordman and every writer out there who makes their intellectual work available for
distribution will be viewed as valuable contributors and they will be remembered as
heroes of the conservative revolutionary movement. Obviously, everyone should have the
opportunity to make a profit, which is why I have suggested to many that they release
their works on two arenas. On one hand, they can sell their products as usual, while still
allowing the armed European Resistance Movement to distribute their works freely,
without legally persecuting everyone who does.
Q: Do you party a lot and what about a girlfriend/wife?
A: I have partied a lot since I was 16 and I still do (with the exception of the five last
year’s where I have lived a lot more ascetic). We just celebrated my friend Peters 30th
birthday with five of my best friends (total of 12 people) in Budapest. We spent five days
there partying and celebrating. I haven’t consumed that many Absolute and Redbulls
since I was in Las Vegas We had an amazing five days. But people at our age start to
settle down, so we will party less in the future. Family will always take priority over
socialising but of course that doesn’t mean that you can’t travel occasionally for a
weekend and party hard.
I guess I had a more normal life until I chose my current path. The path of the Justiciar
Knight isn’t really compatible with that of person seeking to establish a family. I have
traditionally been too ambitious and self centered to focus on a serious long term
relationship as is quite “normal” under our current regime/social structures. Most of my
friends are still very much how I used to be, living normal privileged lives some with
relationships, some single. Since I broke with my normal life (old life) I have lived quite
ascetic, a lifestyle that wouldn’t appeal to that many. However, if I wanted to I could
have more or less everything I set my mind on. I consider myself to be very resourceful,
economically privileged, well educated (although I would probably have to formalise my
education if I ever wanted to work for someone else), fit and very happy with my
physical appearance. Nevertheless, when I had acquired my millions (which was my old
goal in life) I found it all to be very superficial and disappointing. I grew tired of “the
game”, which re-enforced my opinion that I should rather strive to become a better man.
I grew from being a so called “arrogant self centered ***” who didn’t care about anyone
except myself, my family and friends to something better. I wanted to improve myself
morally and seek a more responsible level so I became a better man. I had to pay a high
price though. I left several aspects of my old life behind and had to completely re-
establish myself on an existential level. It was hard because everyone I used to know felt
I had abandoned them. I never burned any bridges though which might explain why
many of them are still pressuring me to “come back”. Obviously, I do not intend to. If
they knew my real intentions my cover would be blown and I would risk being exposed. I
cannot allow that to happen.
Q: Name one living person you would like to meet?
A: The Pope or Vladimir Putin. Putin seems like a fair and resolute leader worthy of
respect. I’m unsure at this point whether he has the potential to be our best friend or our
worst enemy though. He’s very hard to psychoanalyze. I wouldn’t want to be his enemy,
that’s for sure. Obviously, he has to openly condemn us at this point which is
understandable.
Q: Hobbies and interests?
A: Friends, fitness (weightlifting and spinning), snowboarding, opera, theatre, art
exhibitions, antiquities, MMOs, science fiction, Freemasons, European architecture,
European history, European art in general, genealogy, heraldry,
political/stock/currency/commodity analysis, travelling - learning about different cultures.
Annual grouse hunting trip, Oslo Pistol Club, Norwegian Masonic Greater Lounge.
I took a year off when I was 25 and played WoW PvE hardcore for a year.
Conservatism - Alliance, human female mage – PvE, Server: Silvermoon
Conservative - Horde, tauren female resto druid – PvP, Server: Silvermoon
I raided hardcore and was a guild leader in a couple of hardcore guilds: Virtue, then Unit,
Nordrassil – Rank 1 Alliance PvE. We transferred the guild to Silvermoon. I grew tired of
running the guild and sorting recruitment issues so I joined Nevermore, another hardcore
guild on Silvermoon (Rank 3). Silvermoon is the most progressed Alliance server in the
world out of more than 300 servers (10 million + players worldwide) so the competition
is extremely hard. This means we were one of the most progressed guilds in the world at
one time. I can honestly say running a hardcore WoW guild is equally challenging to
running your own business with 7 employees or more. It requires an extreme amount of
work in order to be successful and get server first kills. It was a good experience and
something I wanted to do at least a limited amount of time during a period of my life.
I’m currently playing Modern Warfare 2 casually.
Q: Personal achievements that you are most proud of?
A: I started the early stage of the planning phase (financing the operation) around 2002
by developing a company from scratch: Anders Behring Breivik ENK later converted to E-
Commerce Group AS. During the next years I had a total of 7 employees in five different
countries: 1 person in the US, 2 in Russia, 1 in Romania, 1 in Indonesia and 2 in Norway.
From year 2002 to 2006 I made approximately 4 million NOK. The business concept was
the outsourcing of programming services to clients in the US and Europe by using labour
in Indonesia, Russia and Romania. The products ranged from web sites to advanced
software solutions.
As noted, this, the financing stage, was as you may know a sub-task of a bigger
operation, which is still in progress. The creation of this compendium is actually a larger
and more central task in this process, as I would never have had enough funds to create
it if wasn’t for my earlier financial/business ventures. The actual military operation
is also a sub-task as well as it is a marketing method for the distribution of this compendium
among other things.
Q: Do you still consider yourself a capitalist?
A: Yes and no. I oppose globalist capitalism as globalist firms have too much political
influence but I support entrepreneurship/capitalistic principles on a local, regional and
national level. It is essential to ensure that entrepreneurs are awarded with incentives. I
was quite bombastic about the issue when I was younger, very pro laissez-fair capitalism,
but not anymore. There are so many flaws with the capitalistic system and it has to be
regulated to a certain degree. Globalist corporations should be disallowed to lobby for
free flow of human capital (removal of borders, mass immigration etc). I believe in a free
market limited to a European economic bloc that will be geographically limited to Europe
(with Russia), Northern America and Australia. The Muslim world has to be completely
isolated while Christian Africa and Hindu/Buddhist Asia will still continue to be our trading
partners. China should be excluded from WTO as we obviously are unable to compete
with them demographically. We can’t compete with a country that has 1,4 billion citizens.
Free market is always a good thing to a certain degree. And yes, I am aware of the fact
that with these policies - goods will be more expensive, but at least we keep the capital
within our own countries and avoid trade deficits to non-European blocks. The reason
why the European economic model will never function in the US is because the lack of
national cohesion is so prevalent there. Ironically, seeing the Islamic colonisation of
Europe the last few decades this is about to happen to Europe as well. People lose faith in
the system and will eventually refuse to allow their government to excessively taxate
them. As long as Europe is ruled by the current cultural Marxist criminal network,
Europeans should do what they can to avoid excessive taxation by using tax havens
where possible. Every European should try to avoid funding the current tyrannical
multiculturalist system.
Q: How do you view your brothers and sisters who have initiated smaller scale
operations in the past?
A: I know that tens of thousands of brothers and sister all over Europe are fighting the
good fight every single day. Fighting the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist alliance every
single day. Many have sacrificed everything already; many are incarcerated and some
have even martyred themselves. The media never write about their courageous and
noble acts and the great majority of us are unknown to most people. The current
Western European multiculturalist regimes are doing everything in their power to
suppress our actions. Silencing us is their weapon of choice. They systematically and
deliberately attempt to blackout everything so that as few people as possible know that
there is an ongoing civil war. They do this to prevent recruitment. As history has shown
so many times, the tide will turn in our favour when people least expect it. I salute every
single brother and sister who contributes day in and day out! You are the true heroes of
the conservative revolution! You inspire an increasing number of Europeans to follow in
our path. Hadn’t it been for the brave and selfless actions of these European heroes, me
and people like me would not have been inspired. I heard your calling and as a result I
did my duty as many more will continue to do. Hopefully, I will be able to contribute and
inspire others. We will experience many failures and it will get a lot more ugly before it
gets better. However, never forget that thousands of brothers and sisters are doing all in
their power to ensure our success every single day. We will succeed eventually as
multiculturalism is a self-defeating ideology.
Everyone should learn from past mistakes and share the knowledge with others. Build
your networks on Facebook, continue the consolidation and share ideas but do not
incriminate yourself or others needlessly! The reason why most people are exposed is
because they can’t keep their mouth shut; they brag and tell people they “think they can
trust”. People need to be more disciplined, be more patient, keep their mouth shut and
they should do everything solo, especially in phase 1. When you tell one single person
about your plans you are increasing the chance of exposure by 100%. If you tell 10
individuals you are increasing the chance of failure to 90-95%. There will come a time
when we can work in larger cells (3-20 people) but not yet. These activities should be
delayed until phase 2. Until then, work solo, be disciplined and keep your mouth shut. If
you rely on recognition and encouragement then encourage yourselves based on proven
methods. Follow the guidelines of this book and you will succeed! Keep up the good work.
Believe me when I say, hadn’t it been for your past efforts, I would never have
contributed. You might think that no one cares but there are hundreds of thousands of
Europeans that do care. Reach out to them and focus on consolidation. You are all heroes
of Europe and we salute you!
Q: What would you say to your European brothers and sisters?
A: Know that you are not alone in this struggle. We have tens of millions of European
sympathisers and tens of thousands of brothers and sisters who support us fully and are
willing to fight by our side. The numbers are increasing annually as more and more
people learn to understand what is going on; witnessing the cultural Marxist/
multiculturalist/Muslim atrocities and seeing the Muslim populations increase. Know that
you have loyal brothers and sisters in your country and all around Europe – Great Britain,
Russia, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Poland, Austria, Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark,
Serbia, Norway, Switzerland, Andorra, Armenia, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Georgia, Greece, Hungary,
Iceland, Ireland, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malta,
Monaco, Montenegro, Norway, Romania, San Marino, Slovakia, Slovenia, Ukraine, Cyprus
and the Vatican City. Even Christian Cultural Conservatives in Moldova and Albania.
“I began the revolution with 82 men. If I had to do it again, I would do it with 10 or 15 who
had absolute faith. It does not matter how small you are if you have faith and a plan of
action.” - Fidel Castro
To be here is a privilege. To see clearly is optional. To do the right thing is a duty. It’s critical that
you do not allow the frustration and pain to consume you before you actually manage to
contribute. Be pragmatical whatever you choose to do. There are many ways to
contribute to the struggle. Becoming a Justiciar Knight is just one out of several
manifestations of the struggle:
- Front 1-7 (all non-military), any career/effort that lets you influence others and society
- You can be a blogger, spreading the truth about the topics listed in this book.
- Create a blog today and spread the Conservative Revolution; Wordpress.com, Blogger.com.
Register your blog with nationalist/patriotic/conservative blog networks so you can stay in
touch with others like you. Create a channel on Youtube or join other patriotic channels.
You can publish your videos by creating an account.
- You can infiltrate multiculturalist blogs and forums spreading the same arguments and
documentation which will contribute to recruit more and sow doubt in the hearts of our
enemies. Our enemies have thousands of ”internet apologists” doing the same to us.
- You may try to influence the democratical process by infiltrating the MA100 political parties
(parties supporting multiculturalism) and weaken their resolve from the inside.- You can seek
a career in the police force or the military with the goal of reaching positions
where you gain influence when the window of opportunity opens up within a few decades.
The military command is perhaps the most important arena as it will be extremely
important in phase 2 and 3.
- You can seek a career in any media organisations, particularly the broadcast media.
- Academic infiltration is just as important as joining the guerrilla movement in phase 1. You
might not see immediate results but you are playing a crucial role.
- Another much underestimated task is procreation. By having as many children as possible
and ”moulding them into conservative warriors; to fight with the pen or the sword” will be
the key to our future victory. We need a new generation who has been shielded from the
cultural Marxist/multiculturalist indoctrination campaigns and we need brothers and sisters
who parent these future Europeans heroes. If you are not willing to sacrifice your own life,
then I would strongly advise you to make babies and ensure that they will be willing to
sacrifice theirs when the time is right.
It’s really important that you focus on enjoying life and having fun in this process. Being
a bitter old goat behind a computer will only drive you to depression, and defeat. Convert
your frustration and anger to motivation and resolve. Be positive!
Do not act prematurely. We still have decades so use the time wisely. Above all, do not
sell your life cheaply when the time comes!
The selfless struggle and resistance of an ever increasing number of Europeans has
renewed my hope that there is yet great good left within Europe. We can depart without
fear that darkness will prevail in our absence.
“If you are not afraid of dying, there is nothing you cannot achieve.”
Lao Tzu
Conquer your fear like your brothers and sisters have done in the past and we will re-
conquer Europe from the grasp of our disloyal, corrupt and suicidal cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist elites.
“There is no glory like for those who save their country.”
Lord Tennyson
We fight for the free indigenous peoples of Europe, for those not yet born and for the
memory and wishes of our forefathers, our martyrs. We fight to preserve our culture, our
identity, our country and for Christendom.
All participants in the current Phase 1 civil war will be remembered as the courageous
few, the immortal pioneers, true European heroes who had the courage when no one else
did, who stood up against, and still stand up against an oppressive Marxist tyrant.
We must rise and claim what is rightfully ours! By September 11th, 2083, the third wave
of Jihad will have been repelled and the cultural Marxist/ multiculturalist hegemony in
Western Europe will be shattered and lying in ruin, exactly 400 years after we won the
battle of Vienna on September 11th, 1683. Europe will once again be governed by
patriots.
“A revolution always seems hopeless and impossible the day before it breaks out and
indeed never does break out until it seems hopeless and impossible.”
George Bernard Shaw
With discipline, hard work and sacrifice, we will succeed sooner than you might expect. A
single successful “Operation Regime Ender” after Jan. 1st
2020 will lead to a chain of
events that eventually ensures that the multiculturalist EUSSR hegemony collapses.
Support the reconquista, support the PCCTS, Knights Templar!
ichtyocolle pour peinture
ReplyDeletecomment aiguiser le couteau de bear grylls